To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19948
19947  |  19949
Subject: 
Re: What to do with the oil, post war
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 06:39:47 GMT
Viewed: 
224 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In my view this is a more well thought out proposal than just about any I've
seen:

http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-hutchinson032603.asp

I'm not laying any odds it will actually happen this way. My suspicion is
that the UN bloatocrats will get their fingers on most of the revenues >instead.

You also have the problem that whoever gets to administer the fund instantly
becomes a target for the terrorist organisations who have been left out in
the cold. But the best proposal I've seen yet.

ROSCO



Message is in Reply To:
  What to do with the oil, post war
 
In my view this is a more well thought out proposal than just about any I've seen: (URL) not laying any odds it will actually happen this way. My suspicion is that the UN bloatocrats will get their fingers on most of the revenues instead. (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR