 | | Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
|
|
(...) I wonder how well that would really work, or do you mean I should have my own generator for the winter months when solar is unlikely to provide the power I need. I think electric plants are far more efficient than a generator could be (and of (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Sinfest does it again :)
|
|
(...) Sinfest has a habit of making god look rather ridiculous, you know... (one of the reasons it's one of my faves...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | A pox on your house ( was Re: Outrageous Iraqi Geneva Convention Violation
|
|
(...) The conversation? Well one could wish far worse fates on the readership than for that particular conversation to cease existing, Dave! You know, you sure do use a lot of "!" in your writing, Dave! And what's more, it seems to incite others to (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Sinfest does it again :)
|
|
(URL) K (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: If I were a conspiracy nut...
|
|
(...) Are there any other possible explanations? Or is patronage for certain the only reason this contract was awarded? Patronage sucks, I always hate to see it. But how many US companies are there (please excuse me if I leave out French, German, (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Outrageous Iraqi Geneva Convention Violation
|
|
(...) Whoa, that's quite an indictment! Cease existing! Dave! (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
|
|
(...) Right, but that's just a recount of the accepted votes, and it doesn't factor in the irregularities in ballot format, the use of obsolete machines in democrat-friendly districts, the unlawful removal of legal voters from the voting registries, (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
|
|
(...) So, obviously you think it is untrue, but why? It seems like virtually all the evidence points the way I'm suggesting. And for the record, I don't think that he's as dumb as he seems...he almost couldn't be! But even if he were, it is still (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Outrageous Iraqi Geneva Convention Violation
|
|
(...) You just aren't listening, or being deliberately obtuse. *You* started this thread with: (URL) which you expressed outrage because Iraqis violated Geneva Conventions I, as well as others went on to point out to you, John, that the US, as well (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | If I were a conspiracy nut...
|
|
(URL) which, surprise surprise, Haliburton--Cheneys old company, gets the first contract... Hmmm... Dave K (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Outrageous Iraqi Geneva Convention Violation
|
|
(...) By "same thing", do you mean that *we* are waving white flags at the Iraqi army and then ambushing them, or do you mean that we are displaying closeup images of dead Iraqis shot execution style through their forehead?" (...) Please cite (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | So much for the Geneva convention.
|
|
(...) This got a mention from one of your countrymen [NJ] in a letter to the Guardian published today: Remember Guantanamo (URL) cannot recall a greater instance of hypocrisy in the recent past and a greater disconnect with international opinion. As (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Arab states line up behind Iraq [Duplicity?]
|
|
(...) Yes, is a great day when you have to "buy your posse" to take out "the bad guy". Paying to convince contries to be on-side. NEXT! Dave K (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Outrageous Iraqi Geneva Convention Violation
|
|
(...) And I reject that you can sit there on your high horse and say "Those b*stards!!" when you're doing the same thing. I'm not saying that the US is *morally* equivalent to SH and his regime--I'm quite thankful that, even though it was under (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Which is it; time machine or plagiarism?
|
|
(...) Sinner: repent ye because ye have sinned! The "sin": Larry [2003]: (URL) someone observed to Winston Churchill that his predecessor as prime minister, Neville Chamberlain, was a humble man, Churchill is reported to have replied, "And he has so (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Iraqi Regime?
|
|
(...) Let's be realistic, Scott--my countrymen treated American Muslims like crap long before 9-11. We don't need some outside agency to create our racism for us. We're a nation of do-it-yourselfers! Dave! (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Arab states line up behind Iraq [Duplicity?]
|
|
Arab states line up behind Iraq (URL) summit of Arab foreign ministers has demanded the immediate and unconditional withdrawal of US and British forces from Iraq ==+== All but Q8 condemn the invasion as a "violation of the United Nations Charter" (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Outrageous Iraqi Geneva Convention Violation
|
|
(...) If true, I’m disappointed but not surprised by this story. I’d be surprised if UK servicemen had not been trained to expect this. This “war” looks like taking a little longer than I expected due to the Iraqi’s willingness to postpone the (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Bush Regime?
|
|
(...) "It is, are you?" I never buy it; it is so mind bogglingly dull. But it is a credible news source. Paypal me $2, and I'll mail you a copy. (...) Hmm. "Terrorism", that term is so passé. Try "shock 'n' awe". Scott A (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Iraqi Regime?
|
|
(...) 1. It was a mob. 2. They were not shooting at anyone in the water; they feared someone was in the rushes. [We all fear the unknown to some extent.] 3. Look at how some of your countrymen treated American Muslims in the aftermath of 911. Those (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
