Subject:
|
So much for the Geneva convention.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:19:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
355 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
> Scott:
>
> "America admits suspects died in interrogations"
> http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/story.jsp?story=384604
This got a mention from one of your countrymen [NJ] in a letter to the Guardian
published today:
Remember Guantanamo
http://www.guardian.co.uk/letters/story/0,3604,921177,00.html
==+==
I cannot recall a greater instance of hypocrisy in the recent past and a
greater disconnect with international opinion. As the US invades Iraq in
violation of international law and in opposition to world opinion, it seeks to
invoke the Geneva convention. Where is the Geneva convention and international
law in Guantanomo Bay? Why is there not similar indignation when it is found
that two Afghan prisoners at the Bagram airbase died due to "homicide",
according to the US military?
==+==
So much for "freedom". So much for the Geneva convention.
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread: ![Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Iraqi Regime? -Larry Pieniazek (23-Mar-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Iraqi Regime? -Chris Leach (24-Mar-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Iraqi Regime? -Spencer Nowak (24-Mar-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Iraqi Regime? -Scott Arthur (24-Mar-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Iraqi Regime? -Chris Leach (24-Mar-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Iraqi Regime? -Larry Pieniazek (24-Mar-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Iraqi Regime? -Scott Arthur (25-Mar-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Iraqi Regime? -Dave Schuler (25-Mar-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Iraqi Regime? -Richard Marchetti (24-Mar-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Iraqi Regime? -Scott Arthur (24-Mar-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Bush Regime? -Scott Arthur (24-Mar-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Bush Regime? -Richard Marchetti (24-Mar-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Bush Regime? -Scott Arthur (25-Mar-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|