To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19845
19844  |  19846
Subject: 
So much for the Geneva convention.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:19:30 GMT
Viewed: 
386 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
Scott:

"America admits suspects died in interrogations"
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/story.jsp?story=384604


This got a mention from one of your countrymen [NJ] in a letter to the Guardian
published today:

Remember Guantanamo
http://www.guardian.co.uk/letters/story/0,3604,921177,00.html
==+==
I cannot recall a greater instance of hypocrisy in the recent past and a
greater disconnect with international opinion. As the US invades Iraq in
violation of international law and in opposition to world opinion, it seeks to
invoke the Geneva convention. Where is the Geneva convention and international
law in Guantanomo Bay? Why is there not similar indignation when it is found
that two Afghan prisoners at the Bagram airbase died due to "homicide",
according to the US military?
==+==

So much for "freedom". So much for the Geneva convention.

Scott A



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Bush Regime?
 
Scott: "America admits suspects died in interrogations" (URL) over here in the States, as you may recall, so I ask you: what sort of source is the Independent? My only bigger point is that we are all of us whores for our side -- no one is innocent. (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

14 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR