 | | Re: another goofy question from our resident Canadian! 8^)
|
|
(...) (URL) Dave! (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Liberalism: "Trojan-horse fascism without the jackboots"? [was What has to be the worst...]
|
|
After doing some 'brief' research... I just get more and more set that people are idiots (part 3). I'd include myself in this category 'cause I have done and said some very stupid things... but in here, in o-t.d we throw around ideas, we discuss, we (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
|
|
(...) I'm afraid that I'm not a man of faith, so I can't accept your word without evidence, especially since your entire argument depends on it. If you intend to convince me (or anyone else who doesn't already agree with you), you'll need to find (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Liberalism: "Trojan-horse fascism without the jackboots"? [was What has to be the worst...]
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes: <snip> (...) Was on CNN.com yesterday, basically saying the same thing in the article above (URL) this one has a quotation from the NBC spokesperson: " But NBC spokeswoman Rebecca Marks told The (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Liberalism: "Trojan-horse fascism without the jackboots"? [was What has to be the worst...]
|
|
(...) This story made it to the Guardian front page today: Thousands of Americans want to oust their president. The anti-war one, that is (URL) is under pressure to sack him from its hit show or face a boycott or withdrawal of advertising. Sheen (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Deciphering propaganda
|
|
(...) Yup. Well anyway it's an interesting site. Some of that propaganda is funky. (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Deciphering propaganda
|
|
(...) In the Arabix world, people generally read from the right to the left. That may be a clue. Fredrik (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Deciphering propaganda
|
|
What is this one trying to say? (URL) is it that you have to read it right to left instead of L to R?.. in that case it makes sense) taken from (URL) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What has to be the worst in mug shots...
|
|
(...) Um, which hair? Head? Back? Shoulders? <shudder> -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
|
|
[snipped the numbers] Ok you are only siting the murder rate and calling it the crime rate. Armed robbery is where increase is. The murder rate is essentially unchanged between countries with or without strict gun control. I cannot seem to find any (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
|
|
(...) Perhaps it's a case of the program showing what the viewers wanted to see, so that the program was in turn influenced by the viewership? This is obviously similar to The West Wing. I haven't seen even one second of that show, but does it (...) (22 years ago, 3-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | MASH Goofs--Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes: <snip> (...) Here's a site that I came across when this topic came up (URL) has a good list of goofs--I think the Internet Movie Database (www.imdb.com) probably has another such list. Regardless of (...) (22 years ago, 3-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
|
|
(...) It would also be a mistake to think that they weren't at least unconsciously influenced by it... (22 years ago, 3-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
|
|
(...) Ugly John also played Captain Muldoon, in a later-series one-shot in which the doctors had to run Rosie's Bar while she recovered from cracked ribs. They played Revolving Asians, too. Mako portrayed three different roles that I can think of, (...) (22 years ago, 3-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
|
|
(...) Well then they must have said something about Hawkeye making some remark about credit cards-- which I don't believe were around during the Korean war. Maggie C. (22 years ago, 3-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes: <snip> (...) Or when Harry Morgan was cast as a 'crazy general guy' and, like 4 episodes later-ish, he was the commanding officer of the 4077th. Think anyone would notice that? There was a website I (...) (22 years ago, 3-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
|
|
(...) You're stripping away the numbers for the sake of a punchline. According to the first article, the number of firearms-related murders in 1996 England/Wales was 49. Forty-nine! Pittsburgh alone had 47 murders in 1996, and we don't have a gun (...) (22 years ago, 3-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What has to be the worst in mug shots...
|
|
"David Koudys" <dkoudys@redeemer.on.ca> wrote in message news:HB6GLK.1tL@lugnet.com... (...) (URL) (...) Snipp LOL! Bad hair Day? /Jocke (22 years ago, 3-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: **snip of some stuff, including a good reminder about North Korea*** (...) It should be remembered that one can (or can prefer to) watch a program without swallowing its "message" hook, line, and (...) (22 years ago, 3-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | What has to be the worst in mug shots...
|
|
I know that when the police come "a knockin'" that most folks don't have enuf time to "pretty themselves up"... But this guy... (URL) that has to be the worst pic ever... And what's with that shirt? ;) Few things... Not to be completely facetious (...) (22 years ago, 3-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
