 | | Re: Socialised Medicine (was Re: Dave's Anti-American Rant (you've been warned))
|
|
(...) Why not just abolish taxes for schools rather than having the half-way measure of vouchers? No question of the government subsidizing religion (and who has the biggest chain of private schools? I'd guess the Catholic Church -and believe me, (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Socialised Medicine (was Re: Dave's Anti-American Rant (you've been warned))
|
|
(...) Fine, but I *really* am asking why you think private is better (and I don't mean just for those who have the money to pay for it. I mean for the nation) You don't appear to have evidence yet. The example you give is interesting though as I the (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Socialised Medicine (was Re: Dave's Anti-American Rant (you've been warned))
|
|
(...) The vouchers was a great idea--you send your kid to whichever school system you're most comfortable with, whether it's run by your church or someone else, or even home schooling, and your tax dollars goes to that school system. In this way (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Socialised Medicine (was Re: Dave's Anti-American Rant (you've been warned))
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Simon Bennett writes: <snipL (...) Oh how I wish they would privatize the education system here in the states, but due to the power of the teacher's unions it won't happen country wide anytime soon. I know a few cities (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Dave's Anti-American Rant (you've been warned) was Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
|
(...) There might not be an obviously *stated* implication, but an *inherent* implication--"Those that don't have money, don't get" I am charging money for the services I render, and if you cannot afford to pay, you don't get my services. It's *in* (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Socialised Medicine (was Re: Dave's Anti-American Rant (you've been warned))
|
|
(...) OK. Can anyone who thinks a public health care system is a bad idea please explain why that argument does not hold for a public education system. To me, and I would guess to most who support these two things, they are both about ensuring (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Dave's Anti-American Rant (you've been warned) was Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
|
(...) Well, as a criticism of public-funded programs, it wasn't a very strong point, so don't feel bad if you don't understand it. We've had countless discussions here about the US Gov't prying into everyone's dirty laundry (or medical history), and (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Dave's Anti-American Rant (you've been warned) was Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
|
(...) Let me clarify :) It wasn't Nixon who got the kids in the car, it was the guy who worked in the West Wing. The worker got his kids in the car, drove up to the white house and pointed out to his kids that the most powerful man in the free world (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Dave's Anti-American Rant (you've been warned) was Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
|
My post was a rant. In oh so many ways I am thankful that our neighbour to the south is the USofA. I don't think I would be as happy if *any* other country was our closest trading partner, and I will forgive *any* country's transgressions that had (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
|
Fredrik, I agree with what you say relating to Likud. John, I would like to add that just because the your views and Likud's concur it does not mean that anyone is "proven right". Scott A (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
