 | | Re: Excellent article
|
|
(...) Of course children deserve love and fair treatment, but it doesn't make sense to me to say we (adults) shouldn't tell kids what to do. Perhaps you're being too general with that statement. Parents ARE here to tell kids (and show them) what to (...) (23 years ago, 12-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: DMCA
|
|
(...) You're missing the point. If it was a copyright infringement to play music at a club, there would be no independent clubs in operation. The only legal clubs allowed would be properties of those same copyright holders that prohibit movies from (...) (23 years ago, 11-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent article
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes: <snipped everything> You assume too much. Or maybe I just didn't give enough detail on my parenting practices. My wife and I determine the law in our home. I balance the law in our home with (...) (23 years ago, 11-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent article
|
|
(...) I would hope that everyone would like to see 20-year longitudinal studies. Then we would have some real knowledge to bandy about. (...) How? It didn't actually do anything. Mostly it came on pretty strongly that kids these days have too much, (...) (23 years ago, 11-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent article
|
|
(...) Sure. I'm deeply disturbed by the seeming perception that the only two states that a child can occupy are a) subordinate inferiors and b) overindulged family tyrants. Why is it so tough for people to grasp that there is an actually fair way to (...) (23 years ago, 11-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: DMCA
|
|
(...) Dunno about Kirby, but the bit I don't like about it is here (URL) even (URL) here's another reason (URL) isn't about copyright protection, it's about controlling the distribution of copyrighted material, and the owners of the copyright aren't (...) (23 years ago, 10-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Anniversary of a hoax? (was Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon)
|
|
(...) SRC L#765 (URL) (23 years ago, 9-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Fast food restaurants and Oscar Mayer Wienermobile
|
|
(...) Y'know, in the process of finding a good logo on the KFC website (I ended up combining two in photoshop), I learned that KFC has their secret herbs and spices mixed by two different companies, who of course are sworn to secrecy, and then the (...) (23 years ago, 9-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Fast food restaurants and Oscar Mayer Wienermobile
|
|
(...) Yummy! Eleven herbs and spices! And I have the gut to prove it, too.... -Dave (23 years ago, 8-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Fast food restaurants and Oscar Mayer Wienermobile
|
|
(...) and a darn tasty carcass dressing they do. I love all thoes eleven herbs and spices. Scott (23 years ago, 8-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: DMCA
|
|
(...) Copyright has never allowed you to copy your favorite songs onto a tape or CD to give to a friend. Fair use probably does allow making a custom mix for your own use (so long as you don't then sell or return the originals). Fair use probably (...) (23 years ago, 8-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: DMCA
|
|
(...) Kurby, I hope you have your copy from Copyleft of DIVX :) I know I have mine. Support for organizations like EFF and 2600 is still needed (the 2600 case has so far cost somewhat in excess of 1 million USD) The bad thing is that it is very (...) (23 years ago, 8-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: DMCA
|
|
(...) So you're objection is that the DMCA prevents the theft of intellectual property? I don't see the problem. Copyright law for motion pictures, for instance, has long prohibited non-licensed public broadcast, so why should you be allowed to play (...) (23 years ago, 8-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: DMCA
|
|
(...) First off, it infringes on free usage rights. According to the normal copyright laws in the U.S., we have limited usage rights to other people's intellectual properties that allow us to quote, critique, distribute (with-out profit) them. The (...) (23 years ago, 8-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: DMCA
|
|
(...) To what, specifically, do you object? I'd be interested to explore this topic here on OT.Debate, but I'd like to know something more concrete about your views. In any case, "Know about it/Fear it" is little more than demagoguery. (...) Well, (...) (23 years ago, 8-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | DMCA
|
|
Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) give it a "search" in your search engine, plenty of stuff will come up to link to. Read about it. Know about it. Fear it. This is not a local U.S. law only. This is a step towards globalization and puts (...) (23 years ago, 8-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: AHH! They screwed up more on new Trek!
|
|
(...) I guess you never watched Voyager. That series put the last nail in the coffin of real Trek. -Mike Petrucelli (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: AHH! They screwed up more on new Trek!
|
|
(...) We've talked this up recently...you must've missed it...see here for more: (URL) off-topic.fun...that's where we had it before) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: AHH! They screwed up more on new Trek!
|
|
(...) what new trek? (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: AHH! They screwed up more on new Trek!
|
|
(...) Hmmm. The only gripe I have on Enterprise thusfar is the Akiraprise. Everything else I can live with. (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
