 | | Re: The Scott and Larry show (was: Nothing personal, but...)
|
|
Y'know, the odd thing is I usually find Scott's remarks to be rather arguing the absurd, but I will admit that he's not wrong. Just pointless. (...) You're absoloutely right. Larry should indeed indicate that his statistics for the countries he was (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing personal, but...
|
|
"Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:GF7zI5.LBL@lugnet.com... (...) Here you two go AGAIN! You obviously haven't gotten the whole point of this thread. I doubt many of us CARE who is right, who is wrong, who is insulting who, or (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Separate but equal?
|
|
(...) Yes. Was there something else you wanted to know? ;-) ++Lar (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing personal, but...
|
|
(...) Programming does require higher brain function, but it tends to be very different from the critical examination used in debate. I haven't ever gone deeply into the types of stimulation I get from each activity that I do, but there are definite (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The Scott and Larry show (was: Nothing personal, but...)
|
|
(...) I just re-read the page and the numbers are in thousands, my mistake.... (...) -Duane (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Separate but equal?
|
|
Anyone have an opinion? (Now THERE'S a silly question!) (URL) Dave! (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The Scott and Larry show (was: Nothing personal, but...)
|
|
(...) OK, here's some personal data from my observations. All AFOLs (10) that I have met (granted, a small sampling) in person have been white. Of those, one was a female. According to November 1, 2000 US Government Census estimates: (URL) of the (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing personal, but...
|
|
(...) Oh. My. Goodness. Say this isn't so, Frank! I'd debate you, but I'm afraid we don't have that much to argue about. :) I had somehow presumed your job would require some sort of higher brain function--but am I taking mental engagement for (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Child rearing (was: Nothing personal, but...)
|
|
(...) I agree 100% Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The Scott and Larry show (was: Nothing personal, but...)
|
|
(...) Tom, If it was a HUNCH, Larry needs to make it clear that it was a complete fabrication - not dress it up as fact. Read the text I quoted again - does it sound like a hunch. When Larry said he was "unwilling" to tell us all where he found the (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why the sky is blue
|
|
(...) I've done so on many occasions, seriously trying to answer this very question (is the ocean blue, or is it reflecting the sky?) for myself. One tends to do this sort of thing when studying atmospheric science at the graduate level. There are (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The Scott and Larry show (was: Nothing personal, but...)
|
|
(...) HUNCH. Do you know what that word means? Obviously not. (...) What about the word HUNCH do you not understand? Once again, as usual, you've latched onto one word or phrase in a post and pounded it into the ground, ignoring the entire post (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Child rearing (was: Nothing personal, but...)
|
|
<snip> Further, it is my opinion that punishing both children whenever it is not easily determinable who is at fault engenders the notion that if you can just muddy the waters as to fault, you can get away with stuff to the extent of your victim (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why the sky is blue
|
|
(...) "Why the *ocean* is blue" is not quite the same as the three sources you note, which all address "why *water* is blue". The phenomenom of the ocean taking on the color of the sky (in general) has been long observed and recorded by artists. (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Child rearing (was: Nothing personal, but...)
|
|
(...) From a simply pragmatic standpoint, I never saw the "no supper" punishment as that effective, including those few occasions when I was subject to it. It was too vague a punishment to have any lasting effect, even in terms of negative (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The Scott and Larry show (was: Nothing personal, but...)
|
|
(...) Am I wrong for saying this? Or is Larry wrong for tossing insults about? (...) Nope. From his message: (...) Is so, why is he so unwilling to admit that it was a pure fabrication? (...) I shall quote myself from my last message in this thread (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why the sky is blue
|
|
(...) That is misinformation! Water DOES have an intrinsic blue colour: (URL) Learning" indeed! However, I must apologise for my earlier starement that the bluish tinge of water is due to scattering. It is due to selective absorption (there's the (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Child rearing (was: Nothing personal, but...)
|
|
(...) I know this wasn't the point, but I have to say that such an action is a really disgusting abuse. The kids should be taught to work out their differences and play nicely. Forcing an abusive authority relationship on them won't do anything (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | The Scott and Larry show (was: Nothing personal, but...)
|
|
Hi, My name is Christopher Weeks and I'm a debateoholic. Even when I know I shouldn't both responding, I find my fingers doing their inevitable dance on the keyboard. I just can't stop myself... (...) It sounds an awful lot like "infantile insults" (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: boulders on shoulders
|
|
(...) That's a recognized English word now. I wish I were still in college so I could use it in a paper! Dave! (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
