 | | Re: Virtues of Veganism?
|
|
(...) I don't know the conspiracy side of it at all, but it make head head feel like an over ripe walnut waiting to explode. I just can't drink diet bevs, etc. Mostly I drink water and whole juices, so it's not really problem, but I do occasionally (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Virtues of Veganism?
|
|
Sorry for the delay in replying. (...) Here's an interesting stat from (URL) thirty-five countries surveyed in 1991, the United States cardiovascular death rate ranked 17th for both males and females. The highest death rates were in the Soviet (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) If they can't diagree, then how can they have their own opinion? You may have you own opinion, but hey do to even if it dosn't agree with yours. (...) Oh, and Any Old set being re-released is good, I'm not particliarly into castle, but I've (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Virtues of Veganism?
|
|
(...) I've seen the cycle Dan describes many times. (...) I think what Chris means is that a lot of stuff that we put out at the curb to recycle is actually landfilled if there is no market for it. 'Recycled' newspapers are commonly discarded in (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) hold on now, just a dang minute! don't go getting all touchy feely and trying to hug me and all that or I might just have to bust a cap up in here! (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) First this statment is totally wrong. You can have your own opinion even when everyone disagree. Now do you notice this is a FAN group? We are not a group of professional news reporter or something like that. It's like going to a Star Trek (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) Dang, that's pretty messed up, man! Well, I love ya! ;^) And it's good to see you back. Dan (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) Uh...hi folks. I took a break from lugnet for a bit around april. I still uh..."lurked"...I think thats what you internet folks call it. Any way, I took a break cause I was taking some things a bit seriously. I'm full of hypocrycies, I think (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
|
To hopefully forestall the next person whining about noone paying attention to them. (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Worth the wait? (NO!)
|
|
(...) Hah! Really? That's too bad, it *is* a nifty allegory. I hate it when one of those great sentences has no reality-base. Boo. (...) Hah! I know someone who *did* turn it on. Ewww. And amazingly, he's my best friend. ;-) I shudder at the (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) Welcome to the real world (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
|
"Tom Stangl, VFAQman" <talonts@vfaq.com> wrote in message news:3B22650A.FB6ABA...faq.com... (...) and crying (...) attention! So why you giving it to him? regards lawrence (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Worth the wait? (NO!)
|
|
(...) Until Danger(tm) rears its ugly head. Then you're an intrepid Cave Explorer, Pirate King, and Menace to Bad Drivers everywhere. Just shine the LEGO(tm) Logo into the sky and you'll come! ++Lar (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Worth the wait? (NO!)
|
|
(...) I'm not sure what bait I should be taking. I'm just a mild mannered LEGOManiac... Frank (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Worth the wait? (NO!)
|
|
I have no idea why I locked onto this, but I just did. (...) This is not in actual fact true. It's only true if you have an anesthetized frog. My experience is that a frog will try to jump out of *anything* a human puts it into. It's one of those (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
|
(...) Then grow up and deal with it, you're wrong. Do you actually believe that people MUST read all of your (or anyone's) posts, and comment on them, rather than "ignoring" them, or "looking over" them? GROW UP, the world owes you NOTHING, you (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) That's fine. (of course some of us realise that "every theme is spare parts for " X (where X is our theme) ) But I think Hop Frog is on to something when he says that one shouldn't leave readers with the opinion that one is unhappy or jealous (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Worth the wait? (NO!)
|
|
(...) Now there's a resonable counter to my statement :) Actually, I find what you wrote there quite interesting, and would be interested in seeing your grading system when it is finished as well. (...) Well, it would probably be in their own (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
Sage advice, Matt! Thanks for putting things in the proper perspective. As far as these old sets being released, I don't give a flying f*** as long as there's one Classic Space set released ;^) So, I didn't post a reply to Brad Justus's (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
|
(...) I must also offer my own apologies to everyone at Lugnet. Though I do not plan to continue to post regularly, it was wrong of me to say that everyone here attributes to Lugnet's problem. However, that does not remove the fact that Lugnet still (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
