 | | Re: Jesus is OK (was Re: New Web Page)
|
|
(...) I've heard that before;-) (...) The Inquisition moved to Michigan??! What a terrible imposition;-) (...) Don't look at me. **I'M** not the troll who trolled out "evil Jesus" and "fictitious god". I have no intentions of cramming anything down (...) (25 years ago, 21-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Jesus is OK (was Re: New Web Page)
|
|
(...) **I'M** certainly not going to plow this ground again. This has been talked about here ad nauseum and I haven't the bandwidth to get into a debate about the existence of god. Suffice it to say that I'm as satisfied of his non existance as (...) (25 years ago, 21-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: A summation? (was Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Ho no! you do! :-( (...) (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Jesus is OK (was Re: New Web Page)
|
|
(...) Here we go again. History does have a way of repeating itself. (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Jesus is OK (was Re: New Web Page)
|
|
(...) Analysis?! Based on what? Not facts. For "rational folk", y'all seem pretty confident in things about which you know nothing, which to me sounds irrational. Further, you hold God is fictitious because you have no proof, which *certainly* (...) (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: New Web Page
|
|
(...) Under his analysis Jesus was evil, not just misguided, and was a man, not the Son of God. Further, God is fictitious, and there exist better fictions, for example the one he gave. Seems clear to me. Try to keep up, eh? I confess I hadn't taken (...) (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Genocide and terrorism (Was: SW <-> Russia conspiracy)
|
|
(...) I've seen these stated along with calmly well supported chains of logic and the listeners still shake their heads. (...) If you believe it, I'd be interested to hear it. (...) Sure, new blood gets in, but has to work with the system. Who will (...) (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: New Web Page
|
|
(...) Unless they checked in his bed--(he sleeps with them ) (...) (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: New Web Page
|
|
Yeah, "but he's worth it!";-) -John (...) (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: New Web Page
|
|
Wow, you lost me there. Please clarify the "evil man Jesus" and "better fictitious god" statements. -John (...) (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Genocide and terrorism (Was: SW <-> Russia conspiracy)
|
|
(...) Libertarian Macho Flash is a saying we have in the party. It's an acknowledgement that we often make statements that we believe to be correct, that when made in a well supported chain of argument may be perfectly reasonable, but when made (...) (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
|
<FBzz21.M93@lugnet.com> <374415C5.502DDE51@voyager.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Historically, the thread has morphed, but the point right now is whether or not homosexuality is an illness (...) (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Genocide and terrorism (Was: SW <-> Russia conspiracy)
|
|
(...) Macho flash? Is that something like acknowledging it as a troll for argument? I really hate it when people disagree with this after it is explained to them. (...) This is why I'm not a member of the LP, I agree with all the goals except that I (...) (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: A summation? (was Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
|
|
<37421ED7.8F4BB887@voyager.net> <FC01x0.2AH@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Who? I am not "gun crazy", whatever that means, but I own a handgun, am trained in its effective use(1), am (...) (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Genocide and terrorism (Was: SW <-> Russia conspiracy)
|
|
(...) Right, that was the intent. (I hope not too.) (...) I meant the scenario to refer to an adult child, for sake of completeness say a 22 year old. I'm assuming from your reply that you were envisioning a child child. (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: A summation? (was Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
|
|
<37421ED7.8F4BB887@voyager.net> <FBzGnp.L04@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Ya, me too. A debate is different than an argument! In formal debating the goal is to convince the bystanders, (...) (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
|
Can someone summarise what this debate is about? I confess I have no idea at this point. If no one can summarize, stopping may be a good idea. (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Genocide and terrorism (Was: SW <-> Russia conspiracy)
|
|
(...) He's a fellow traveler. A clarification, though... Libertarians support defense too, just not the bloated inefficent overpriced pork laden one we have now. Really. Libertarians are against taxes too. Taxation is slavery (1). We just recognise (...) (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: New Web Page
|
|
(...) Ah, so there we have it. Canada. Now I understand. You guys have what, 2, maybe 3 people per square mile up there? Not enough people in one area to stir up the kind of trouble we have to deal with down here. :) (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: New Web Page
|
|
(...) Really? I will have to look that up now. If for no other reason than curiosity. I'm not sure I'm ready to accept that I can only exercise my 2nd ammendment rights within the confines of my own state. (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
