Subject:
|
Re: New Web Page
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 May 1999 19:21:39 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@ctp.*stopspam*IWANTNOSPAM.com
|
Viewed:
|
949 times
|
| |
|
|
John Neal wrote:
>
> Wow, you lost me there. Please clarify the "evil man Jesus" and "better
> fictitious god" statements.
Under his analysis Jesus was evil, not just misguided, and was a man,
not the Son of God. Further, God is fictitious, and there exist better
fictions, for example the one he gave.
Seems clear to me. Try to keep up, eh? I confess I hadn't taken the step
of calling Jesus evil but I'm aligned with most of the rest of analysis.
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
FDIC Know your Customer is wounded, thanks to you, but not dead...
See http://www.defendyourprivacy.com for details
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Jesus is OK (was Re: New Web Page)
|
| (...) Analysis?! Based on what? Not facts. For "rational folk", y'all seem pretty confident in things about which you know nothing, which to me sounds irrational. Further, you hold God is fictitious because you have no proof, which *certainly* (...) (26 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
