| | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
|
(...) A little late on the reply here (missed this post), but here goes anyway: I don't see them as bad per se, it's just that they seem to be replacing LUGNET, because people only have so much time to devote to LEGO (what is wrong with these (...) (14 years ago, 28-Aug-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
|
(...) Editing goes against "the newsgroup spirit", which was a big deal to Todd... (and maybe that means the implementation of editing would be hard, I have no idea) But cancellation, if by the author, does not go against that spirit, in my view. (...) (14 years ago, 31-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
|
(...) I also agree that Lugnet was THE place to go back in the day and I also wouldn't mind seeing it rise again. But I am just thinking that Lugnet's inability to edit and cancel posts will be a huge factor preventing it from being the proverbial (...) (14 years ago, 30-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
|
(...) While I am also disappointed with the reduced interraction on LUGNET, I don't see other boards as bad, even if they aren't superior in features. And I totally disagree about flickr - it allows conversations to go every which way no matter (...) (14 years ago, 30-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
|
(...) Yeah, but I think that the analogy is flawed. The horseless carriage is FAR superior to what it replaced; other boards may have a nice feature here and there, but they are not VASTLY superior to LUGNET. I think that there is great value in (...) (14 years ago, 30-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
|
(...) You know, Horse and Buggy Repairmen were the same way about the horseless carriage ;) (...) I suppose it's nice to dream,,, :P (14 years ago, 30-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Taking shortcuts
|
|
(...) LOL Stonehenge!! Good one, Manfred! I have heard of (URL) Duncan's handiwork> before! :-) JOHN (14 years ago, 26-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Taking shortcuts
|
|
(...) Mmm-mmm, Stonehenge was a VERY advanced calculator, for it's time... (14 years ago, 22-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Taking shortcuts
|
|
(...) I'm not worried about disk space so much as I am worried about render/move/edit time. Unnecessary polygons, even after being read in and converted into internal models, take time to process. I think you can see the difference in POVray render (...) (14 years ago, 21-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Re: Taking shortcuts
|
|
(...) But that was a long time ago :-) Nowadays we *do* have an awful lot of disk space, and don't really have to squeeze the files. OTOH, every 'unnecessary' byte to read will take time, again and again while rendering, unless the rendering program (...) (14 years ago, 21-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: Taking shortcuts
|
|
(...) Was it a digital switch or an analog? (14 years ago, 21-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: LifeLites and the Galaxy Explorer
|
|
(...) The parenthetical "h" acknowledges the fact that "Jonathans" aren't real Johns, but simply nicknamey posers. :-p JOHN (14 years ago, 21-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: LifeLites and the Galaxy Explorer
|
|
(...) That's a classic name Jo(h)nny B. Good!! :) I didn't mention my step bro-Jo(h)nathan.,, :) But even with him, ya got me beat... Dave K (14 years ago, 21-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Taking shortcuts
|
|
(...) You were lucky! We didn't even have skin! All we had was twine to try and keep our entrails in! And they would leak out all over, and parents would beat us to death each night for mussing up the floor! JOHN (14 years ago, 21-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Taking shortcuts
|
|
(...) Rocks! Wow you must have been one of the rich kids that I heard about when growing up. We would have killed to have rocks for doing our computations. Our parents would hit us with a switch and use our backsides for doing their fancy adding and (...) (14 years ago, 21-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Taking shortcuts
|
|
(...) My third computer had two floppy disk drives holding 113.75KB of data each. This was in 1979. Each drive cost $600. (14 years ago, 21-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: Taking shortcuts
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Larry Pieniazek (...) Well, when I was young, we didn't have fancy-schmancy comPUters. We had to use rocks for all of our computations. And it took all day to collect enough rocks to multiply 12x12 and our hands would get (...) (14 years ago, 21-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: LifeLites and the Galaxy Explorer
|
|
(...) I'll call with a Grampa John, my kids have 3 uncle Johns, and MY best man was a Jo(h)n. Come to think of it, I'll raise you with this: my best man's full name is Jonathan Bryant Good;-) JOHN (14 years ago, 20-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Taking shortcuts
|
|
(...) Ooooh - this can be a fun game. :-) One of my first (sorry, don't remember the order of them) was a computer I built myself. I ordered the 3-chip set from Intel (8080, the clock chip and the buffer chip), then used a bunch of SRAMS (no way (...) (14 years ago, 20-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: LifeLites and the Galaxy Explorer
|
|
(...) Around these parts (central Alberta), "Chris" has been the common name for computer geeks. Once, when I worked on campus, I kicked one person out of my office, and grabbed another walking by in the hall, to have 4 computer "Chris's" in my (...) (14 years ago, 20-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|