 | | Re: Aeroflot Antonov An-28
|
|
(...) Timmy: It seems like we do not play well together. Let's take the high road. Stop snipping at me and I will stop snipping at you. We must be boring others and we both have better things to do with our time. John P (19 years ago, 4-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Aeroflot Antonov An-28
|
|
(...) Glad I amused you so much. Spotlighted! Thanks for sharing. Tim (19 years ago, 4-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Aeroflot Antonov An-28
|
|
(...) Thanks Timmy, that is just so funny. What a great source of really good jokes you are. That one had to take a long time for you to think up. Jay Leno watch out. Funny Timmy is on the loose. John P (19 years ago, 4-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX) !
|
| |
 | | Re: Aeroflot Antonov An-28
|
|
Thanks and no :) --snip-- (...) No. I misspelt it ;) Tim PS. Post sent to .off-topic.fun to make it clear to the sergeant that this is a joke. (19 years ago, 4-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
|
(...) I think I understand your point, but, even so, I must say I don't think using that term is a good idea. (...) I would? I defer to your knowledge of the Israeli military - incidentally, I'm sure that's not the only thing about some of them that (...) (19 years ago, 2-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
|
(...) But it does make a point. I read a lot of old messages and it seems that there are some people here that want the forums to be what they want. If something does not fit their point of view about subject or style they let everyone know. Nazi (...) (19 years ago, 2-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
|
(...) While fora often have some people who are overzealous, and some who post "not nice" messages from time to time, in my experience, labelling them with a term that signifies hate and genocide is not likely to be productive. Richie Dulin FUT (...) (19 years ago, 2-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
|
(...) Ah, I see it now. Didn't pick it last night. I blame the drugs. Cheers. (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
 | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
|
(...) Nice tap dance Timmy John P (...) (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
|
(...) I understand that you understood well what I was doing and I was just taking advantage of many things to hopefully help illuminate to everyone as to exactly what was sorry about my post (well, at least some of it) and was also posting for (...) (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
|
(...) Oh I understood perfectly well what you were doing but I just took advantage of the spelling mistake to misunderstand for humorous (I hoped) effect. It would appear that the sergeant missed this point but that's not entirely surprising. Tim (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
|
(...) Reply to my own post so I can insert my sig (that I keep forgetting about!) and to see how replying to one's self looks on legnet. Man do I wish that this interface had editing capability. But I am happy that Firefox 2.0.0.3 has built-in (...) (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
|
(...) I was saying that I was sorry for stealing almost all of Tim's words from his post seen here (and the joke being fairly lame now that I think of it - lol): (URL) (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
|
--snip-- (...) He didn't apologise... he appologised. There was a reason I snipped ;) Tim (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
 | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
|
(...) The funny thing is, as far as I can tell, and fwiw, Word Spellcheck agrees, Bob didn't make any spelling errors in that post. And so the mystery remains as to what exactly Bob was apologising for... Allister - spring loaded to the baffled (...) (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
 | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
|
(...) Geeze Tim, you too can post "not nice " messages. Each forum has its "Forum Nazi's." While I am off inventoring, why don't you go and stick some bricks together. John P (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
|
(...) I think I do get it. (...) I appreciate Tim's contribution to the community here, few come close to his involvement and knowledge. His MOC production is, I think, unequalled in recent times. I do not think LUGNET is 'his forum', but I (...) (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
|
(...) Thanks sergeant. Now be a good boy and do some more inventories. Tim (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
|
(...) Richie: Don't you get it? Tim G has something to say about everything. I am surprised he doesn't respond to his own postings. You know Lugnet is his forum, don't you? John P (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: New style brick separators free from Knex
|
|
(...) They are no longer free, but they do work well. Knex bricks and plates are all slightly rounded at the top (child safety) and the new seperator acts like a tweezers, easily fitting into the connection between elements and separating. (19 years ago, 30-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|