Subject:
|
Re: siggy testaroo
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 May 2007 21:22:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4197 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.test, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
Oh I understood perfectly well what you were doing but I just took advantage
of the spelling mistake to misunderstand for humorous (I hoped) effect. It
would appear that the sergeant missed this point but that’s not entirely
surprising.
Tim
|
I understand that you understood well what I was doing and I was just taking
advantage of many things to hopefully help illuminate to everyone as to exactly
what was sorry about my post (well, at least some of it) and was also posting
for humorous effect (I’m hopeful as well).
I’m glad we cleared that up!
And due to the convoluted nature of this thread, I can fully understand Mr.
Patterson’s missing not only that point (since there is a distinct possibility
that no where here is a point), but logically all points possibly.
Now we aren’t supposed to be agreeing anywhere in .off-topic, are we? Or does
that only apply in .debate?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
| (...) Oh I understood perfectly well what you were doing but I just took advantage of the spelling mistake to misunderstand for humorous (I hoped) effect. It would appear that the sergeant missed this point but that's not entirely surprising. Tim (18 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
