 | | Re: Hope to help, edify and soothe, but probably won't
|
|
(...) ! I'm still laughing ! :p Dave writes this super-long message and you simply just pick up on the ‘AA’ reference… -Really funny stuff.- ;) P.S. I really didn’t mean to hijack this thread. Sorry! (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: IE 6 Image Woes
|
|
(...) True. I just wanted to call attention to this stuff in case someone had the sense that things were supposed to look better but for some seemingly unknown reason they did not look better -- and without tweaking they will not come to look better (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: IE 6 Image Woes
|
|
(...) [snip] Or: 1. Install Mozilla 2. Never use IE again. (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants
|
|
(...) How so? (...) Oh? What is your understanding? (...) No you didn't. The topic was already discussed and out it the open. People knew exactly what was being referenced, which is why you were banned. Your demonstration of a point that was already (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants
|
|
(...) Hi Bruce, It's those darn Christian ethics of mine--I always have this prevailing hope that people can be redeemed. I'm not the one who do the redeeming, but they can, for themselves, show some sort of movement to bettering their situation and (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | IE 6 Image Woes
|
|
It occurs to me that many people are probably using IE 6 by now; at the same time most people are likely unaware of some weird and poorly chosen default settings in the browser. Now this may seem off-topic, and I have set followups accordingly, but (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants
|
|
(...) I'm sorry, Dave, but how can there be a clean slate when Scott is dirtying it faster than it can be cleaned? Your current discussion with Scott simply illustrates all of his usual tricks: decrying personal comments while getting in as many as (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants
|
|
I think if we bring it right back to the beginning of this particular thread, Larry posted many good ideas and ways for us to agree to disagree and move on. Let us all, then, in the spirit of gentlemen, move on from this particular issue to other (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants
|
|
I'm probably making a big mistake in responding, but... (...) Ok, I dug out the post I believe you are referring to. In that particular exchange, you were choosing to jump on a single point of mine (as you do to everyone) and tearing me down for it. (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: New ProBuilder Set?
|
|
I'm replying to my reply to myself, so I hope that no one objects to this breach of etiquette. This seemingly rare set has shown up on Ebay: (URL) set's really pretty nifty. No new or particularly unusual pieces, but the designs are good, and I love (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression?
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes: <snip> (...) This is not clarification. You concede that my interpretation could be one way of reading what you said, i.e. "You think that others are ignoring you because you believe your point is (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Now whereabouts on the axis of evil can we be?
|
|
(...) Canada is only such good country due to the large amounts of my countrymen who went out to help build it! ;) There was quite a good show on TV here last week about the Scots-Canadians who returned to fight for Great Britain in WW1. The main (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants
|
|
(...) I seem to remember that the last time we interacted here, your post was described as an “extreme overreaction”… and you were advised to ignore me. ;) (...) …and I am still grateful for that and your continued involvement on Lugnet (...) As I (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression?
|
|
(...) Clarification: I do not think what you claim. I accept that my statement could be interpreted in that way. However, it is not the only way it may be interpreted and it is not the way I meant it to be interpreted. (...) Now you are not being (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Now whereabouts on the axis of evil can we be?
|
|
(...) King Jean until the right finally realize that when they're split, the libs will remain in power until the end of time. The NDP, being the 5th party in a 5 party system, will not cut into the libs majority enuf to count. I don't agree with the (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Nemesis, thread two (Re: Two Towers (was Re: Fellowship))
|
|
(...) Yeah, that's what I explained to them. In 'Star Trek' time, Voyager would have been home for a year or two before the events in this movie happened--presumably getting Voyager home mostly intact would have gained a promotion for Janeway. (...) (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Nemesis
|
|
(...) I don't recall any movie stating, "And it has N decks," but I do admit I'm trying my hardest to forget Insurrection. Okay, not quite my hardest; people keep telling me there was a movie between _The Voyage Home_ and _The Undiscovered (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Nemesis, thread two (Re: Two Towers (was Re: Fellowship))
|
|
(...) Not sure of all the details (because I'm only a part-time geek), but I presume Janeway made the film for continuity's sake and because Jeri Ryan is busy with Boston Public. As far as the Romulans & Borg, there was some TNG episode regarding a (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Now whereabouts on the axis of evil can we be?
|
|
(...) One thing in the article that was wrong was the statement that the majority of the country was not right wing. Don't forget the right wing vote is divided between 3 parties Alliance, PC and BQ which have the majority of the popular vote (but (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Now whereabouts on the axis of evil can we be?
|
|
(...) I love being Canadian. Yep, article pretty much sums up the prevailing winds around here. Though, to be said, looks as if this writer took some of his research from an article in the Toronto Star--I posted a link to it earlier and right now (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
