 | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
|
(...) And Spandex, Dave! How could you forget Spandex!? Maggie (22 years ago, 15-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Oxford Castles
|
|
(...) Paul was kind enough to scan and send me images of these. I've reduced them slightly to fit on my server, but here you go: (...) (URL)DC68000 - Castle - approx. 665 pieces: (URL)ORD65000 - Red Devil - approx. 650 pieces: (URL) Many thanks to (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
|
(...) Sure, but that's circular reasoning at its finest. I've read numerous works of modern Christian apologetics in which atheists are ridiculed for their so-called arrogant refusal to believe in a god, coupled with the further straw-man argument (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Nemesis
|
|
(...) Geeky?!?! Die by my Bat'leth! :^) (...) Agreed. That was an awesome sequence. I especially loved how the ships were firing those volleys out. And they FINALLY acknoweledge the fact that those ships only have so many torpedoes! (...) The (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Nemesis
|
|
I'd like to disregard this movie's many faults and talk about some of it's cooler aspects in regards to .space (.geek included cuz, well, trek=geek) If there is one thing that stuck with me after I left the theater, it was how graceful the Romulan (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Geek trivia help?
|
|
(...) I think we should be ashamed. My only ray of hope is that someday there will be a gameshow where this information could be useful or profitable. In the Wizard issue this month there's a 80's toy trivia article. I scored way above the editors (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Unless God really has revealed the one and only path to Heaven to an individual/s. Then declaring it is not arrogance at all - its simply declaring the truth. <snip> (...) Just because something is old does not mean it is false (I (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Oxford Castles
|
|
I got three Oxford castles last week. OFC50000 - Palace of Dreams - approx. 525 pieces: I got this one to do with my daughters. It's has pointed circular roofed towers. A King and Queen, a white horse, a Witch, a servant, and 2 guards... But no (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Mega Bloks New Alien Agency
|
|
Has anyone looked at the Mega Bloks web site today under Mega Bloks Kids? It showes a new line called Alien Agency... A Men in Black take off. It looks like it might be cool, and did I forget to mention monsters! Paul (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes: <snip> (...) D'oh! I forget sometimes that my e-mail program for my home account has to be started manually when I'm at work. So I didn't get Bruce's message until now. So there you are. Dave K (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Target Cabeese?
|
|
They're all wrong. The one true term is STF - scientifiction. Ask Hugo. You cannot be a trufan without STF. (Personally, I think Thomas Disch got the last word on this debate.) You can be skiffie fans if you like that. (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Target Exclusive Trains On Clearance
|
|
(...) And the world has changed. I understand some people now consider SF an abbreviation for Speculative Fiction, not Science Fiction. Frank (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants
|
|
(...) What is amusing is that I had just sent David a private message telling him the pattern of Scott's debating "style" and the exchange just preceeding your message was the proof of it. It's like pulling teeth. You have to go round and round in (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants
|
|
(...) Don't think I'd call it a troll, per se; though there were elements that were troll-ish. (...) But you could be bothered to say that you couldn't be bothered to say how ironic you find it? I can't be bothered saying how silly I think that is. (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants
|
|
(...) I'm an incredibly tolerant person. It takes quite a bit to get me to speak ill of someone. Scott Arthur has pushed me to that point. I register as one point of evidence the current debate between Dave K and Scott A. Dave was trying to be nice (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression?
|
|
There was once a "Home Improvement" episode, with special guest star Tom Wopat (from "Dukes of Hazzard" fame...). In this episode, right at the very end, Tom comes up to the door and talks to Tim. The scene went something like this: <Ding dong> goes (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants
|
|
Larry, I'm really flattered by the effort you put into this troll. However, I just can't be bothered showing how ironic I find what you are saying. Scott A BTW: Do you remember when you spoofed my identity? (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression?
|
|
(...) Good. (...) Letting go is good. I don't see the need to compromise on every issue. (...) I think I have been. (...) [snip] (...) You'll have to show how you reached that conclusion. [snip] (...) OK. (...) I do not ignore Larry. I very much (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants
|
|
I'm starting a new thread to address this topic partly because Dave's original post was hung on a thread and partly because that thread is so big. I think there are two different questions here Should discussion on a topic cease (for a while, (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression?
|
|
(...) Didn't say *you* did any of these things. *We* here in ot-d have a problem. We have to come up with a working solution to said problem. In my opinion, this solution should not entail 'Playground Politics'--'Lets just ignore him and he'll go (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
