 | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark —John Neal
|
| | | (...) But it is their system. What the clones should be doing is creating unique bricks that work within the LEGO system, not recreating them. JOHN (15 years ago, 18-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Why can't they do both? Mega Bloks has a huge number of unique elements that are LEGO-compatible, in addition to the more basic and conventional pieces. If they were only to produce unusual elements and no basic pieces, then they'd almost (...) (15 years ago, 18-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Parasites, Dave! >:-P (15 years ago, 18-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark —David Laswell
|
| | | | (...) Doesn't work that way. Without a core of standard basic elements, the best they'd be able to hope for is a business model similar to what you see with BrickForge/BrickArms/Little Armory etc. If all you can make are elements that enhance the (...) (15 years ago, 18-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) I completely agree with all of what you are saying, Dave. What I am saying is that it doesn't seem right for a company to sponge off of another without providing compensation or something. Licensing, for example. It is little wonder why clones (...) (15 years ago, 19-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark —David Laswell
|
| | | | | (...) That's not going to happen. After their experience with Samsonite, I guarantee TLG will want nothing to do with that sort of arrangement, especially in a market where they're already selling their own products. (...) More significantly, stuff (...) (15 years ago, 19-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) While I agree with the morality, the legality is another issue. In essence, though, your point has already been addressed. Thanks to their patent, LEGO enjoyed an exclusive right to production for 20 or so years, allowing them to be the (...) (15 years ago, 19-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Agreed. (...) I guess I am just an old dog stuck using that with which I've always known: LEGO. Even if another company were in fact able to do a better job than TLG, I doubt that I would convert. Yeah, yeah: capitalism. Though I would say (...) (15 years ago, 19-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | (...) I guess here's the rub: To turn it around for a minute, suppose that MegaBloks had come out first, and produced poor quality bricks. Then, when their patent ran out, LEGO decided to make awesome bricks that matched the MegaBloks standard, (...) (15 years ago, 19-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | (...) If TLG produced better quality bricks, I wouldn't see the advantage of making them compatible with a competitor's inferior product. (...) Yes they can. JOHN (15 years ago, 20-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark —David Laswell
|
| | | | | | (...) Here's a better question. If that had been the case, would anyone have even had the desire to attempt to clone MB at all? There are several different construction toy systems out there, and so far the only one I've really seen any non-bootleg (...) (15 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | (...) Happens now and again. As I recall, toy vehicles that transformed into robots were marketed in the USA with almost no success, but Hasbro took the idea, attached a story line to it, and an animated show, and it took off like wildfire. I expect (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) That's an interesting question to ponder. When LEGO-scale Mega Bloks came onto the scene, they filled a gap that LEGO had left open. Namely, MB produced simple sets with large quantities of basic elements in unusual colors, such as military (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) That's a great point, Dave, and it brings to mind two related issues: 1. Competition. I wonder what path LEGO would have chosen in the mid-90s if they didn't have a significant market competitor to deal with. Mega Bloks was just starting to (...) (15 years ago, 19-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) I would concede that point to you, Dave! But, in the future, please try to refrain from ending sentences with prepositions. It's embarrassing. (URL) (...) Well put, Dave! JOHN (15 years ago, 20-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | (...) Doh! Caught with my participle dangling for all to see. Scandalous! (15 years ago, 20-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark —David Laswell
|
| | | | | | (...) "This is the sort of language up with which I will not put." -Winston Churchill The false idea that you can't end a sentance with a preposition in English comes from the fact that you literally can't in Latin. You shouldn't just tack a (...) (15 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark —David Laswell
|
| | | | (...) You're assuming that TLC actually took cues from MB in terms of how to fix their business model. In terms of the AFOL market, all it meant to TLC was that their customers stopped buying as much stuff, not that they started buying the (...) (15 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| | | | |
