Subject:
|
Re: Manchester's Millyard in the news
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.mediawatch
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Dec 2006 19:27:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4082 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.mediawatch, David Eaton wrote:
> In lugnet.mediawatch, Eric Kingsley wrote:
> > Unfortunately the one thing that we just can't seem to show with photos is the
> > sheer scale of this project. It is truely huge in every way possible.
>
> The best I can do is show how a person (and an ISD!) actually compares to the
> layout as a whole (the map isn't the most up-to-date version, but it's close
> enough to get the idea)
> http://www.suave.net/~dave/images/millyard/millyard_scale.gif
>
> Over 97' long and more than 23' wide. Nearly twice the floorspace of my
> apartment. More than 98 minifig-scale acres. Over 3,200 32x32 baseplates worth
> of area.
>
> Actaully, I wonder how it compares to the NMRA show?
The real question on everybody's mind: how many 1x2x2 classic white windows did
it take? I guess now we know why they brought those puppies back into
production!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Manchester's Millyard in the news
|
| (...) The best I can do is show how a person (and an ISD!) actually compares to the layout as a whole (the map isn't the most up-to-date version, but it's close enough to get the idea) (URL) 97' long and more than 23' wide. Nearly twice the (...) (18 years ago, 1-Dec-06, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
