 | | Re: Nathan Sawaya in Extreme Makeover: Home Edition
|
|
(...) snip (...) snip (...) I watched the show. Since EHME did the LEGO Room for Brandon in May 22nd, 2005, I've have wondered if thay'll do a LEGO Room again. When I saw the LEGO stuff coming together, I was listening for the L word, since I was (...) (18 years ago, 23-Jan-07, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nathan Sawaya in Extreme Makeover: Home Edition
|
|
(...) I missed seeing all but the last bit. (...) That's kinda odd - "The LEGO Group" was listed in the credits. (...) Sweet stuff! Steve (18 years ago, 22-Jan-07, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Nathan Sawaya in Extreme Makeover: Home Edition
|
|
Hi all, there was an episode of Extreme Makeover on ABC this week that fetaured a family in Raleigh, NC. I was pretty happy to see that since I live there - they were unfortunately filming while I was out of country. But what was a really neat (...) (18 years ago, 22-Jan-07, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego name used in Scientific American
|
|
For some reason, I think that everyone at TLG (lawyers included) is preoccupied with the corporate downsizing this year. I had repeated requests for LEGO lawyer involvement with the LEGO CD, but never got a single reply. The folks in the LEGO (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego name used in Scientific American
|
|
(...) Well, I guess we probably won't know if Lego approved or disapproved... All we know is that if they DID disapprove, they didn't have the will or the ability to back it up! It would be odd if they approved, though-- especially since their use (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Lego name used in Scientific American
|
|
I note that in the February Issue of Scientific American there is an article entitled "MOLECULAR LEGO". And within the article a side bar reference to "Nano Lego". I am very surprised that TLG tend to encourage us to not use their name and yet (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Systems, Inc. sells Enfield complex for $58.9 million
|
|
(...) Keep in mind that wages in the U.S. are considerably less than in much of Western Europe. In Switzerland, the minimum wage is $22/hour. A lot of that is a consequence of the effects of VAT on national economies over there. Production in the (...) (18 years ago, 16-Jan-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Systems, Inc. sells Enfield complex for $58.9 million
|
|
(...) I will make an idle observation (from way out in left field)... The market for LEGO seems to be soft (beyond description) at the moment. My BrickLink store is experiencing one of the slowest Januarys that I have ever seen. I saw signs of this (...) (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Systems, Inc. sells Enfield complex for $58.9 million
|
|
(...) It is expensive to own property that is much too large, and to suddenly become a landlord leasing the unwanted areas, is almost never a wanted activity when you need to save money. It is probably "sell it all" and "re-lease only a part" that (...) (18 years ago, 13-Jan-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Systems, Inc. sells Enfield complex for $58.9 million
|
|
(...) When you own the property, you benefit from the increase in real estate values over time. When I originally bought my house, my mortgage was higher than it would have cost me to rent a comparable house. Within five years, this was no longer (...) (18 years ago, 13-Jan-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Systems, Inc. sells Enfield complex for $58.9 million
|
|
(...) Yes, and C&S, one of the largest grocery distributors in the region is doing the same thing with a couple of facilities not far from Enfield - selling the buildings and then leasing them. The company I work for, also in the same region also (...) (18 years ago, 13-Jan-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Systems, Inc. sells Enfield complex for $58.9 million
|
|
(...) IBM did a similar sell-off of their buildings and lease back a couple years ago. It turns out to save on US taxes. -dw (18 years ago, 12-Jan-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Systems, Inc. sells Enfield complex for $58.9 million
|
|
(...) Gary's right. One the things that is happening is that globalization of resources...the US has higher wages than the rest of the world in many things, so to bear the costs that consumers want, less expensive places have to be found to produce (...) (18 years ago, 12-Jan-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Systems, Inc. sells Enfield complex for $58.9 million
|
|
(...) No it will still be around. In the future LEGO may not be owned by Kjeld and Gunhild anymore (Godtfred Kirk Christiansen's 2 surviving children), however it will still be around. There's too much value in the brand name. A future owner may (...) (18 years ago, 12-Jan-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Systems, Inc. sells Enfield complex for $58.9 million
|
|
Lego is on it's way out, plain and simple. By 2012, it will be a memory. (18 years ago, 12-Jan-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Systems, Inc. sells Enfield complex for $58.9 million
|
|
(URL) (18 years ago, 11-Jan-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX) !
|
| |
| | LEGO® Systems, Inc. sells Enfield complex for $58.9 million
|
|
LEGO® Systems, Inc. sells Enfield complex for $58.9 million, leases office space. By:Howard French, Journal Inquirer 01/03/2007 LEGO Systems Inc., has sold its Enfield buildings and leased back space in some of them for its operations, which are the (...) (18 years ago, 9-Jan-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Outsourcing and LEGO
|
|
Interesting story on MSN Money on Outsourcing and LEGO. Glad her set during Brickfest. I hope LEGO learns from this mistake. Mexico is not the answer. (URL) (18 years ago, 3-Jan-07, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Re: SpongeBob LEGO makes the Forbes.com 'most in-demand toys of 2006' list ;)
|
|
(...) I'm not at all surprised at this. I had the hardest time finding a Krusty Krab for my niece. Adrian (18 years ago, 3-Jan-07, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: SpongeBob LEGO makes the Forbes.com 'most in-demand toys of 2006' list ;)
|
|
(...) Cool, thats great to see... Now if Lego would only get their... errr ABS together, and actually starting adding "chicks" to their sets more frequently we could have a Sandy Cheeks. Poor neglected girls! Janey "Red Brick" (18 years ago, 3-Jan-07, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
