Subject:
|
Re: X.com... good idea, good execution?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.theory
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Feb 2000 15:07:22 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
Troy Cefaratti <mnementh@nacs.!nospam!net>
|
Viewed:
|
583 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
> I made a credit card deposit to my X.COM account and it was treated as a
> purchase. Have to love getting those free 1000 frequent flyers miles, then
> writing a check out of that account to cover the credit card bill.
Unfortunately, the credit card companies will put an end to this as soon as
they catch on. :/
There was a big story on the news a couple years back about something
similar to this. A couple raked in MILLIONS of frequent flier miles because
their credit card offered a double miles bonus on purchases through
Triple-A[1]. The couple would simply go to triple-a, buy $10,000 worth of
travelers checks, and then use the travelers checks to pay the credit card
bill.
Needless to say, the credit card company put an end to this in a hurry by
changing the rules.
Troy
[1] I believe it was triple-a, but it was several years ago. It may have
been through one of the airlines.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: X.com... good idea, good execution?
|
| (...) I remember this too. You are right that it was AAA. The couple used AAA because AAA was the only place where you could buy traveler's checks without any transaction fee. The thing that makes the X.COM system unlikely to change is the $1000 per (...) (24 years ago, 11-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: X.com... good idea, good execution?
|
| (...) Their "live" on-the-web chat support told me that credit card deposits were treated as purchases, but that that may change in the future. I made a credit card deposit to my X.COM account and it was treated as a purchase. Have to love getting (...) (24 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
15 Messages in This Thread: ![X.com... good idea, lousy execution? -Larry Pieniazek (25-Jan-00 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: X.com... good idea, lousy execution? -Julie Krenz (25-Jan-00 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: X.com... good idea, lousy execution? -Mike Stanley (26-Jan-00 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: X.com... good idea, lousy execution? -Rob Doucette (28-Jan-00 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: X.com... good idea, good execution? -Larry Pieniazek (9-Feb-00 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: X.com... good idea, good execution? -Mike Poindexter (9-Feb-00 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: X.com... good idea, good execution? -Frank Filz (9-Feb-00 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: X.com... good idea, good execution? -Will Middelaer (10-Feb-00 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: X.com... good idea, good execution? -Will Middelaer (11-Feb-00 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: X.com... good idea, good execution? -Troy Cefaratti (11-Feb-00 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: X.com... good idea, good execution? -Frank Filz (11-Feb-00 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: X.com... good idea, good execution? -Mike Stanley (11-Feb-00 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: X.com... good idea, good execution? -Will Middelaer (11-Feb-00 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: X.com... good idea, good execution? -Ray Sanders (16-Feb-00 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|