Subject:
|
Re: eBay nailed?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.theory
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Feb 2000 16:19:36 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera.com[nomorespam]
|
Viewed:
|
667 times
|
| |
|
|
Troy Cefaratti wrote:
> Under the conditions you describe above, it would surely work. And if an
> admin has been warned, then I agree, they should be held accountable.
>
> I still feel, however, that on a whole it would be ineffective to stop the
> problem. There will always be enough sites that either do not have full
> time admins, or have inexeprienced ones. And the tools of the rackers are
> always changing, so even if you have top-notch admins there is no guarantee
> that they will anticipate all attacks ahead of time.
Yep, you're right. There is no utopia. What makes it harder is that the
mutation rate of the cyber environment is so very much higher than that
of the biological environment... Air scrubber or water purification
technology doesn't need to be totally reinvented every month, after all.
--
Larry Pieniazek - lpieniazek@mercator.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: eBay nailed?
|
| (...) and (...) NOT (...) bandwidth and (...) negligence (...) away. (...) Under the conditions you describe above, it would surely work. And if an admin has been warned, then I agree, they should be held accountable. I still feel, however, that on (...) (25 years ago, 11-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
