To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.market.theoryOpen lugnet.market.theory in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Marketplace / Theory / 36
35  |  37
Subject: 
Re: No really - a rational discussion of people selling via eBay?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.market.theory
Date: 
Wed, 19 May 1999 16:23:31 GMT
Viewed: 
2595 times
  
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> 
> Frank Filz wrote:
> 
> > What I find objectionable (and what I think most people are actually
> > complaining about) is hoarding not scalping.
> 
> Whew. Well, that's a relief, then.
> 
> You've got nothing to worry about in a free market, because hoarding
> just can't happen. As long as multiple sellers of the product exist, the
> market will be at what the product is really worth.
> 
> The only way you can get hoarding is if the product is so rare that one
> person actually CAN corner the market, or if governments help enforce
> artificial scarcity. Remember the oil crisis? Our government helped the
> Saudis and others corner the market. Hence we got scalping, hoarding,
> black/grey marketeering and all the ills you get when you try to
> outthink the market. As soon as prices were allowed to rise to their
> natural level, voila, end of scarcity. It's amazing what wells came
> online when oil sold for more than the cost of production again. Priced
> oil lately? It's cheaper in real dollars than it was in 1972 before the
> first oil crisis.
> 
> If you don't like hoarding you should be pushing for freer markets. We
> have relatively free markets generally but they can be improved.

I agree with all of the above.

> Fortunately the situation W.R.T. LEGO is pretty good. We have multiple
> venues and prices have been generally improving as they move toward
> market levels. Priced metroliners lately? They are plentiful and cheaper
> than they were a year ago. It's amazing what lines of supply open up
> when they start selling above 300 dollars.
> 
> Now, you say, wait. You, Larry, just paid 421 dollars for a metroliner,
> what are you talking about? Well, that was no ordinary metroliner. It
> was scarce. There will only be ONE first lot auctioned at Serious
> Collector and it was worth more than the going rate for a run of the
> mill metroliner for me to have it.
> 
> Is Franz K. a hoarder because he has a stock of metroliners that he's
> releasing one at a time? No. There are plenty of metroliners out there.
> Is Mobil Oil a hoarder because it doesn't immediately pump all of its
> oilfields dry? No. There is plenty of oil on the market. Franz wants a
> steady cash stream, so does Mobil.

I'm not absolutely sure that I would not call Franz K. a hoarder, but I
have no problem with what he is doing. Once an item is out of production
long enough for most areas to no longer have a stock, I think it is GOOD
for the market for an entity which is willing to sell to a wider segment
of the population to pruchase the goods, and re-sell them. Your point
about steady cash stream is reasonable. Also, not putting all the items
instantly on the market means that at some later time, a new customer
will be more likely to be able to buy the item.

> I don't like eBay. But that's because of the bidding rules and because
> it encourages scalpers. I won't use it. But I am not going to flame
> anyone else for using the most efficient (biggest collection of goods,
> biggest collection of buyers) market we currently have available to us.
> And neither should anyone else.
> 
> Now, I think there's value in the discussion we had here before (which
> never came to a satisfactory conclusion, I don't think) on how sellers
> could devise a system to discourage snipers that was within the rules of
> eBay.
> 
> Snipers are bad for sellers. At least that's a position that many of us
> sellers take.
> Snipers are frustrating for buyers. At least that's a position that many
> of us buyers take. But let's not debate it again, it's been debated.

Absolutely agreed about bidding systems, and I certainly would be
interested in seeing further discussion on how to devise an anti-sniping
mechanism within the current rules of eBay.

--
Frank Filz

-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: No really - a rational discussion of people selling via eBay?
 
(...) Whew. Well, that's a relief, then. You've got nothing to worry about in a free market, because hoarding just can't happen. As long as multiple sellers of the product exist, the market will be at what the product is really worth. The only way (...) (27 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.market.theory)

20 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR