| |
In lugnet.market.theory, Jake McKee wrote:
> In lugnet.market.theory, Gordon Thomas wrote:
>
> > Case 2: Certain BrickLink shops
> > Selling 500 4496 tubs at 17.99 suggests that they are buying direct from lego
> > as a retailer otherwise the price breaks would not be there. This would
> > directly violate the purchase terms for parting out sets and selling
> > internationally, not to mention being online only.
>
> Assuming they actually have 500. I've wondered from time to time how many people
> are padding their inventories to get attention, but not actually having the
> inventory on hand. Remember the guy who claimed to have 200 Maersk sets before
> they actually went on sale?
That's the thing Jake, I think Ray is saying it's the same guy.
>
> I've passed this site along to Legal to get more information on this, and I'm
> sure they'll be all over it. Between the strange "authorized" thing, the
> "borrowing" of the legoshop.com stylings and imagery, the "borrowing" of
> lego.com graphic materials, and the incorrect trademark usage, something smells
> fishy.
>
> Jake
I'm sure I'm not the only one who is much obliged.
Maggie C.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
