 | | Re: Regarding Bricklink Utilities
|
|
(...) Optimal cost is, I'm sure, a very difficult problem (probably NP-complete). But even ignoring shipping costs would be a good place to start. Minimizing the number of stores reduces shipping cost. It may not the absolutely lowest cost, but it's (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.market.shopping, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) When the AFOL community asks for something and the response is that we represent only 5% of their market so don't expect anything, that does send the message that we are not important to them. (If they want to give me "only 5%" of the money (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) I don't think it does either. At least not completely, because the market isn't a shifting one (at least not at the like LEGO/don't like LEGO level) I'm just drawing the analogy to the very first people in that model that take something up (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <larry.(mylastname)@...areDOTcom> wrote in message news:I17q8K.EHH@lugnet.com... [ .... snipped ... ] (...) early (...) just (...) [ ... snipped ... ] I am not sure I think the Chasm model applies to this market but I may be (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) It would help if I realised Chris was talking about BrickShelf instead of BrickLink. I still think the point stands though... not all users are current users and not all users are serious AFOLs, it's (somewhat more?/about as/nearly as?) likely (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) Minor detail: not all LUGNET members are AFOLs, since AFOL stands for Adult Fan Of LEGO and only people 18+ are adults. I am a TFOL, by the way, and what you would call a 'serious AFOL' Nathan Wells (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) They've never said that. 5% is simply 5%. Each company decision has a business case behind it. Certain AFOL wants have favorable cases, others don't. You may believe their business analysis is inherently flawed in some way, but unless you can (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) I think we are in overall agreement. Just to clarify, I was talking about BrickSHELF not BrickLINK. I viewed a total of three folders on the "Recent" page there and found a BS member with an ID in the 24000+ range, which is how I estimated the (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) That's never been my assumption, but it's a good place to start. While all Lugnet members are AFOLs, not all of them would qualify in my book as "serious AFOLs". I should also clarify that my definition of "serious AFOL" is probably different (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) Yeah, but the results are only as accurate as the guesstimates used as inputs - GIGO you know. This debate reminds me of the various number games used to justify (or not) the belief that extraterrestrial life exists. Since there are so many (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
