 | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —Mike Stanley
|
| | | (...) Well that takes a load of my mind since you're one of my largest buyers. :) I think it could work out well for everyone. (...) Do you read it as you having a choice? I read it as "once you go over the limit we'll snag any CC funds sent your (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Ok, just reread the policy change. You're right, and I'll quote: "Credit card payments sent to a Personal Account in excess of the limit will be held as "pending" until the recipient chooses to accept the payment by upgrading or to return it (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —Paul Sinasohn
|
| | | | Sorry, Mike... If you start insisting on eCheck or PayPal, you will forever lose my business, not that I've bought much from you, but I object to what PayPal has done with limiting a buyer's use of credit cards for payment. In fact, I'm not using (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Do you mean legally? Or from a reputation perspective? I don't think that you are legally required (in a mutually voluntary transaction) to accept or not accept any particular form.(1) I certainly can, and will, refuse to accept payment in (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | (...) So you object to PayPal not giving you a free service? Welcome to the real world where everything has a cost. There ain't no free lunches. I'm not sure if PayPal has wrangled an agreement with the credit card companies or if they are eating (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | SARCASM WARNING re: PayPal payments —Paul Sinasohn
|
| | | | | | | | <GRIN> OK, Frank, how much am I going to charge you for paying me for those big gears </GRIN> (which finally arrived, so I do need your address to send them to you) Do you need the old-style studded wheels with metal axle for them? I'll scare some (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | | (...) Ooo. I think some nation just got slammed. Or is that nations? Steve (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —James Powell
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) More like Lar wants to go home and play with his Lego :) James (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) How so? All I am saying is that I am not home to process mail. I've said before that Josette doesn't like to do it, and doesn't do it very accurately. So getting mail is a huge hassle because I am not there to see it. Nothing else. However I (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) What does the term "This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private" mean? It's printed on all of our currency. I remember reading once (5-10 years ago) that all US cash had to be accepted as a form of payment except pennies. I (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Um... I give. For that matter, what does "in God we Trust" mean? I don't. Does that mean I can't use the money if I don't? I think that whatever terms I arrange and which the other party accepts, are binding. If I am not specific about how I (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) No, no, no! You're supposed to dispense information. Jeez. ;-) (...) It is the invokation of good-luck voodoo that keeps our economy stable. Duh. (...) I don't think that's logically the same since it doesn't instruct on a point of law. I (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) I think what Mike meant is that if you're paying by Paypal, it has to be by eCheck or balance transfer, not CC. I just went to sign up for Paypal, and stopped. Not out of any objection to policies, or fee structures, no. It's because they (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Well, that's certainly your choice. But I never said I am going to insist on eCheck or Paypal. What I am talking about is that if someone is going to pay me WITH Paypal I think we should all agree to do it the eCheck way (which is one of the (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —Paul Sinasohn
|
| | | | (...) If you'll still accept other forms of payment, then I'll still buy. Got any 2x2x5 girders around? :-) (...) The problem I have is that PayPal places an unreasonable hold/delay on funds wired in to them. Wired moeny is already in their hands - (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) ... (...) Why are you WIRING them money? If you verify a checking account with them, they will make a draft withdrawal from your checking account (and I have yet to hear of a bank charging for that). They also place a hold on your credit card (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) No, but if you can give me an ldraw part number and sets that contain it I'll keep an eye out for them. :) (...) Not really any different, though, than what your bank does with putting a hold on deposits, right? I agree, it is a pain, but a (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —Paul Sinasohn
|
| | | | (...) 2x2x5 girders came in 1682 in red, in 6444 in black, and in 3313 in grey. Ldraw #s are 2579 and 2580 (both are needed) (...) There IS a difference, though - a paper check deposited cannot be instantly verified. A wire or EFT withdrawal, (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) You need a new bank then. Do they charge you $42 to pay bills also? Frank (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Can we all agree to do eCheck payments with Paypal and not CC? —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Hrmmm - I think I may actually have several 6444's in my Lego room. Probably take me a few more months worth of working my way through the piles of unopened sets to part out and sell before I can find them, but I know I picked up several on (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
