 | | Re: UPDATE: Re: Weeks Box - round two (...no, really!) —Frank Filz
|
| | | (...) Fabuland). (...) future (...) the (...) I (...) think (...) chimney, (...) and (...) just (...) be (...) I'm beginning to wonder if I mixed up the smoky box with something else (Shiri - who did the box I brought the JB in come from before me - (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: UPDATE: Re: Weeks Box - round two (...no, really!) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | Well, I just go the box back yesterday and just looked through it today. I have to say that I am less than enthused. I think that the value of the box is similar to how it was before I dropped the RCX in. So basically, I think it lost about $50 (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jan-01, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: UPDATE: Re: Weeks Box - round two (...no, really!) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) I think one problem is the wide variation in values of items. For example, back at Brickfest when I traded in a couple packs of shooting cannon, what value is best to use for them? The $5.25 or so they cost me, or the $20+ that they go for on (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jan-01, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: UPDATE: Re: Weeks Box - round two (...no, really!) —Doug Finney
|
| | | | | [Major trimming since I figure all of you just read Chris' post] Bleah, that sounds majorly disappointing. My guess is there are people (or person - it obviously doesn't take many) who view the boxes as a place to "get cool pieces they want in (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jan-01, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: UPDATE: Re: Weeks Box - round two (...no, really!) —Kyle Keppler
|
| | | | | This is kind of confusing here. I admit that I don't sell parts and might not have the best idea of what parts are worth but I took very little out, so I think my trades were fair. If I remember correctly I took out I think 3 adventures torsos, 3 (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jan-01, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: UPDATE: Re: Weeks Box - round two (...no, really!) —Tamyra Teed
|
| | | | | Christopher Weeks wrote: <snip> (...) I didn't give it to anyone else. (...) I have no idea on the figs, I didn't look at any of them since I have enough figs right now, and spare parts for a couple if needed. <snip> (...) I know it took me a little (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jan-01, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: UPDATE: Re: Weeks Box - round two (...no, really!) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) Hmm, it does almost seem like there was an extra person between you and me. Did you check the box when it came back to you after the first attempt to mail to Kyle? I wonder if I managed to misplace a bag of stuff (or could Kyle have?)? As I (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jan-01, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: UPDATE: Re: Weeks Box - round two (...no, really!) —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | (...) Hmm... (...) Yep, I saw most of them... (...) Not that I can think of...? (...) It definitely had Tamy's return address, i remember it clearly. (...) Actually, I took a few pairs of hands - they were in useful colors. But there were minifigs (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-01, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
