Subject:
|
Re: MF #2 Box Weight
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.jambalaya
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Apr 2000 03:11:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
770 times
|
| |
|
|
"Shiri Dori" <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:FtJs0J.JGD@lugnet.com...
> Oh, I forgot.
> There are quite a few technic figures in the box, and one or two belville
> figs, and a few BV dogs. Some of these were placed by Rob so it doesn't • mean
> they are unwanted; I'm just wondering, because this is, after-all, a • *mini*fig
> box. But that's just my view of things.
> If BV and technic figs are of any interest, I could put some in; if not, I
> could take them out. They take up a LOT of room in comparison to the • minifigs,
> and IMHO it's a shame, 'coz shipping costs could be lower. But it's not my
> opinion that counts here, it's everyone's, so LMKWYT.
I added several technic figs (including a diver w/dive gear) and BV dogs
only because I have lots of them to give (I figure the dogs could go with
the technic figs) and because I hate them. They didn't add anything to the
cost of shipping since USPS Priority Mail price breaks on the pound. I did
add more parts (by weight) than I took out, but I weighed the package to
ensure it stayed in the $4.30 range. Package weight is something to
consider though...
-Rob.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Minifig Box #2, another update
|
| Oh, I forgot. There are quite a few technic figures in the box, and one or two belville figs, and a few BV dogs. Some of these were placed by Rob so it doesn't mean they are unwanted; I'm just wondering, because this is, after-all, a *mini*fig box. (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
