Subject:
|
Re: Minifig Box #2, another update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.jambalaya
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Apr 2000 01:02:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
824 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.jambalaya, Shiri Dori writes:
> Oh, I forgot.
> There are quite a few technic figures in the box, and one or two belville
> figs, and a few BV dogs. Some of these were placed by Rob so it doesn't mean
> they are unwanted; I'm just wondering, because this is, after-all, a *mini*fig
> box. But that's just my view of things.
> If BV and technic figs are of any interest, I could put some in; if not, I
> could take them out. They take up a LOT of room in comparison to the minifigs,
> and IMHO it's a shame, 'coz shipping costs could be lower. But it's not my
> opinion that counts here, it's everyone's, so LMKWYT.
>
> -Shiri
I would argue for leaving the Belville and Technic figures in.
Paul Sinasohn, who is on the MF2 box list somewhere....
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Minifig Box #2, another update
|
| (...) *mini*fig (...) minifigs, (...) As long as we remind people of the "don't overwhelm the Jambalaya boxes with one type of part, especially parts that people are less likely to be interested in because everyone has too many of them" convention, (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Minifig Box #2, another update
|
| Oh, I forgot. There are quite a few technic figures in the box, and one or two belville figs, and a few BV dogs. Some of these were placed by Rob so it doesn't mean they are unwanted; I'm just wondering, because this is, after-all, a *mini*fig box. (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
