| |
Well he (A) appears to read LUGNet. All you tough talking Americans have
scared him.
Thanks for the help.
Scott A
Dave Schuler <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message
news:FrDo21.207@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, Paul Davidson writes:
> > Yeah...it's pretty serious when someone takes your money or parts on a • deal,
> > and A. doesn't give you what the deal called for, B. keeps merchandise of
> > yours that belonged to a separate deal, and C. tries to use the situation • to
> > control you.
> >
> > Print hard copies of all your correspondence (I hope you save email) and
> > take it to the police.
>
>
> Having been burned on an auction or two myself, I can certainly understand • the
> desire for caution, especially concerning such bizarre circumstances.
> However, is it necessary for the first response to be a litigious one? I
> think my initial course would be an Email stating my position and my
> dissatisfaction before involving legal authorities. Has this option been
> tried?
> Certainly all Emails and correspondence should be retained, but one • would
> hope that the situation could be resolved without escalating it too much.
> Granted, the other party has demonstrated some weird practices, but might • an
> appropriately-stated message be sufficient at least to clarify Scott's
> position?
>
> Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: My Lego is being held hostage!
|
| (...) Having been burned on an auction or two myself, I can certainly understand the desire for caution, especially concerning such bizarre circumstances. However, is it necessary for the first response to be a litigious one? I think my initial (...) (27 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
