 | | Re: Discussion Post: Auczilla —James Aldrich
|
| | | (...) You received regular updates; didn't you save one? (...) I've never experienced a mistake with AucZILLA. If I did, I'm sure it would be corrected immediately. AucZILLA may have a long delivery time, but I feel that is more than compensated for (...) (26 years ago, 17-Dec-98, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Discussion Post: Auczilla —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) (which pretty much sums up James's (1) whole post, in my opinion) Just as with the eBay threads, JSA is right, as usual. As far as he goes, anyway. However I wonder if our discussion will actually lead to some ideas that Todd can make use of (...) (26 years ago, 17-Dec-98, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Discussion Post: Auczilla —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | | (...) I think a simple page updating the status on winnings being shipped would be nice. Just a list or table would do. Admittedly, my stuff is on a much smaller scale, but I've gotten good responses from the ones I've done like that. (26 years ago, 17-Dec-98, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Discussion Post: Auczilla —Sarah Heacock
|
| | | | | | | (...) That is true. And I will not be bidding in AucZILLA any longer until I see the distribution time go down. (I have faith that it will. Eventually) I hate to "vote with my pocketbook" like this when the person RUNNING the auction is someone I (...) (26 years ago, 17-Dec-98, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Discussion Post: Auczilla —James Aldrich
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I understand completely; been there. As disorganized as I am in general, I have conditioned myself to print out my AucZILLA tally as soon as my bids are finalized. I hear you on planning as well. When AucZILLA VI winnings arrived, I had to (...) (26 years ago, 17-Dec-98, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Discussion Post: Auczilla —Jim Baker
|
| | | | | | Also sprach Larry Pieniazek: : 1 - I have no idea if I put the "'" in the right place or not, that one : always confuses me. Allow another James to wade in ... the possessive form of our name is: James' It looks funny, but it's correct. / _ _ / _ _ (...) (26 years ago, 17-Dec-98, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Discussion Post: Auczilla —Jim Baker
|
| | | | Also sprach James Aldrich: : The solution is simple: You pays your money and you takes your choice. : If AucZILLA doesn't suit you, don't participate. If AucZILLA VII was : your first, you had ample opportunity to learn how it works and what to : (...) (26 years ago, 17-Dec-98, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Discussion Post: Auczilla —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) I think VI was really the one that "got away." Here are the approximate historical sizes: Auction - Pieces - Packages I - 30,000 - 85 II - 5,000 - 72 III - 30,000 - 87 IV - 95,000 - 185 V - 210,000 - 276 VI - 225,000 - 343 <--- peak VII - (...) (26 years ago, 17-Dec-98, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Discussion Post: Auczilla —Paul Foster
|
| | | | (...) So where does the Monstra Auction fall into this? Wasn't that the auction with the different name? (26 years ago, 17-Dec-98, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Discussion Post: Auczilla —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | (...) Mecha-AucZILLA? (26 years ago, 17-Dec-98, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Discussion Post: Auczilla —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) That was between AucZILLA I and II but didn't consist of pieces -- only whole sets (new & used). I think it was in the summer of '95. --Todd (26 years ago, 18-Dec-98, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | | |
