Subject:
|
Re: Totem pole?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Tue, 29 Feb 2000 21:40:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
627 times
|
| |
|
|
Well, I asked if anyone was doing anything a week or so ago, and got no
replies, so I was thinking that it wasn't going to happen.
From my point of view, 'I will if you will' :-)
Let's say:
* A footprint of 32x32 or smaller.
* The top & bottom to be at least two studs thick,
* and the top to be liberally sprinkled with tiles, so that we can get
the sections apart again.
Any more for any more?
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Huw Millington (<FqpJt6.4xF@lugnet.com>) wrote at
20:01:09
> Is the totem pole a go-er then?
>
> I have just made something fairly interesting out of bits from 4 x 7171 that
> I could adapt into a pole section.
>
> If so, what's the interface specification?
>
> Huw
>
>
--
Tony Priestman
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Totem pole?
|
| (...) What is this Totem pole thread all about? (Sorry, I must have missed the original messages). It sounds like an opportunity to build a massive Lego tower in sections but that would require scaffolding wouldn't it? Jon (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | Re: Totem pole?
|
| FWIW, my concerns about fest IV are that we are in danger of spreading ourselves too thin. I would imagine there's plenty to keep us busy just with trains. However, that might not suit everyone. But in my own mind, the theme for Redditch is (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Totem pole?
|
| Is the totem pole a go-er then? I have just made something fairly interesting out of bits from 4 x 7171 that I could adapt into a pole section. If so, what's the interface specification? Huw (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
