Subject:
|
Re: Largest Lego collection in Canada
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.ca
|
Date:
|
Thu, 7 Jun 2001 02:16:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
393 times
|
| |
| |
I took the numbers straight from each of the person's set list in their
LUGNET member page.
And I do agree that those numbers are not likely the most accurate, and I
did mention that in my post, but those were the most easily accessable
numbers that I could find. :)
Hey, how did you end up in local.canada eh? :-P
~Adam
In lugnet.loc.ca, Frank Filz writes:
> In lugnet.loc.ca, Adam Murtha writes:
> > I don't know for sure, but checking the set lists for the LUGNET members in
> > Canada, the top people are:
> >
> > James Brown with 117554 pieces and 707 sets.
> > Eric Lanteigne with 115750 pieces and 520 sets
> > Jeff Shiner with 87960 pieces and 728 sets.
> > Jean-Marc Détraz with 49230 pieces and 168 sets.
> > Kyle Jackson with 47452 pieces and 324 sets.
> >
> > But those numbers don't account for people who don't have the set list
> > filled out, or are not even offical LUGNET members. Also not (likely)
> > included are the pieces that have been bought via eBay or other sources.
>
> Is there some trick to getting these numbers?
>
> I'm not sure how much you can rely on this type of thing. I suspect that many
> of the largest collections aren't represented. For example, my listing shows a
> mere 5838 pieces, whereas my catalog spreadsheet shows 300k and it's missing a
> LOT of stuff. Unless there's a way to upload a set list, my collection won't be
> showing up on Lugnet anytime soon.
>
> Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Largest Lego collection in Canada
|
| (...) Is there some trick to getting these numbers? I'm not sure how much you can rely on this type of thing. I suspect that many of the largest collections aren't represented. For example, my listing shows a mere 5838 pieces, whereas my catalog (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jun-01, to lugnet.loc.ca)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|