Australia : 9219


Local / Australia / 9219	9218 \| 9220

Subject:	Re: Re Brickshelf links (was Re: A standard docking port/shaft)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.loc.au
Date:	Tue, 9 Jul 2002 03:32:43 GMT
Viewed:	728 times

In lugnet.loc.au, Richard Marchetti writes: > In lugnet.loc.au, Richard Parsons writes: > > > > Never go looking for fresh brickshelf links. > > Wouldn't deep linking to the images themselves solve this problem? > -- Hop-Frog oops i posted to the wrong newsgroup first! here it is, dudes! this is the general idea for the port--the actual width can be changed as wished. i wanted to display the arrangement of pegs & holes that work well http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Jeff-S/CAD/dockingport.jpg Jeff

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Re Brickshelf links (was Re: A standard docking port/shaft)
(...) P.S.: this would work for BOTH sides of the port -the ship & the station-- that's the beauty of it--one design that has male & female parts! (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Re Brickshelf links (was Re: A standard docking port/shaft)
(...) Wouldn't deep linking to the images themselves solve this problem? I just tested this idea here: (URL) it seems to work fine. Just get the URLs to the actual images and paste them into your MOC anouncements. No waiting for approval necessary (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)

10 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search