Australia : 9211


Local / Australia / 9211	9210 \| 9212

Subject:	Re: Re Brickshelf links (was Re: A standard docking port/shaft)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.loc.au
Date:	Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:27:30 GMT
Viewed:	782 times

In lugnet.loc.au, Richard Parsons writes: > > > Never go looking for fresh brickshelf links. Wouldn't deep linking to the images themselves solve this problem? I just tested this idea here: http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/test/foo/?n=28 And it seems to work fine. Just get the URLs to the actual images and paste them into your MOC anouncements. No waiting for approval necessary -- instant gratification. I don't happen to think that Kevin necessarily handled this brickshelf situation in the absolutely best way possible and I do think I disagree with his intended plan, but the reality is that the way it is being handled ain't that big a deal either. Just deep link. -- Hop-Frog

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Re Brickshelf links (was Re: A standard docking port/shaft)
(...) oops i posted to the wrong newsgroup first! here it is, dudes! this is the general idea for the port--the actual width can be changed as wished. i wanted to display the arrangement of pegs & holes that work well (URL) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Re Brickshelf links (was Re: A standard docking port/shaft)
(...) Jeff! dude! Its not your fault (exactly), and its not really Brickshelf's fault (exactly). I'd love to see your stuff, but "This file is not yet public" I guess I'm supposed to check back from time to time in the hope that at some stage it (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)

10 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search