Subject:
|
Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Jun 2000 05:04:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
801 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.loc.au, Kerry Raymond writes:
>
> > and where did the road plates come from
>
> Argh! Having just said the road plates were not Lego, I took a closer look
> at the next picture and they are Lego after all, studs and all. Oh well, I
> never saw anything so sophisticated here in Australia in my childhood.
>
> Kerry
Yeah, when I checked out the 1965 catalogue on BenW's suggestion I saw the
"Town Layout" kit with the road plates and instructions for building the
structures IIRC. Oh to have been around in those "glory years" (without trying
to sound ageist).
I think Shiri's comment about kids attention span is spot on, and it's a real
shame. Society is actually discouraged from stopping and smelling the roses,
as you run the risk of being left behind (not an overly bad thing IMO). Tell
most people you spent the weekend building with LEGO, or doing a jigsaw puzzle
or some other single-task multi-hour activity and they'll think you're the
most boring thing in existance.
Pete Callaway
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK?
|
| "Peter Callaway" <pcallaway@bmcl.com.au> wrote in message news:FwFss9.Cxv@lugnet.com... (...) puzzle (...) This is the view that most people have of thesis students, who spend a whole year doing a single task. :) Excuse me, I haven't done anything (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK?
|
| (...) Argh! Having just said the road plates were not Lego, I took a closer look at the next picture and they are Lego after all, studs and all. Oh well, I never saw anything so sophisticated here in Australia in my childhood. Kerry (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
13 Messages in This Thread: ![RE: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Benjamin Whytcross (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Kerry Raymond (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Peter White (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Peter Callaway (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Shiri Dori (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Kerry Raymond (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -David Drew (21-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Kerry Raymond (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Peter White (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Kerry Raymond (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Peter White (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Deidre Rushton Brumby (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|