Subject:
|
Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Jun 2000 04:36:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
795 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
> Go to the index page http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/ideabook/ and check out
> some of the other images. It looks like they're using pre superfast wheeled
> Matchbox cars in the town scene on page 4a (and where did the road plates come
> from?).
Yes, they look just like the Matchbox cars that I used in my Lego
constructions back in the early-mid 60s. We used to put (live) lizards in
the Lego houses as we didn't have mini-figs back then. Admittedly I can see
the benefits of using mini-figs; the lizards were inclined to escape if
given the chance.
I don't think the base plate in the picture is Lego though. It looks more
like a piece of painted plywood; certainly there are no studs on it. The
Lego road-layout baseplates are a far more recent development.
Kerry]
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK?
|
| (...) Go to the index page (URL) and check out some of the other images. It looks like they're using pre superfast wheeled Matchbox cars in the town scene on page 4a (and where did the road plates come from?). They could make some pretty cool stuff (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
13 Messages in This Thread: ![RE: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Benjamin Whytcross (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Kerry Raymond (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Peter White (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Peter Callaway (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Shiri Dori (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Kerry Raymond (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Peter Callaway (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -David Drew (21-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Peter White (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Kerry Raymond (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Peter White (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK? -Deidre Rushton Brumby (20-Jun-00 to lugnet.loc.au)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|