 | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup? —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | I think it is precisly these types of posts that keep them away. Many people post expecting answers *right now*, often on things they may not be able to respond to. I think everyone needs to give them some breathing room. I also think they should be (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup? —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | (...) Very good points, Jeff. I wasn't going to hop in on this thread myself to be totally honest. It disturbs me in many ways. But at this point, I have something I really want to get out. The attitude posters and administrators on this site (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct) !!
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup? — Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | | (...) Current policy already allows this. Jake, for instance, is using his unofficial account right now. And conversations similar to the recent '20 Questions' have always been allowed on LUGNET. LEGO employees are welcome everywhere on LUGNET. The (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup? —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | Suz: Is their absence especially irritating because they have used references to Lugnet for certain marketing practices (like the Mania Magazine, I think it was), and that probably without permission? So they trade on the Lugnet name but don't (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup? —William R. Ward
|
| | | | | | | Suz, I'd appreciate an answer (too). --Bill. (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup? — Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | | | | | I do want to answer this, but it'll be long and right now I'm exhausted.. I will. I promise. -Suz (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Suz Q&A was:[Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?] — Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | | | Here are some short answers, for now.. (...) no. (...) I didn't disclose anything while I worked for TLC (1996-1999), but it's not a secret anymore. I worked for R&D. LEGO Futura, Boston office. LFB's job was to come up with cool, innovative LEGO (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.people)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Suz Q&A was:[Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?] —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | (...) I guess I meant: what did you learn from being on the *inside* that informs your attitudes about the company overall and/or how to deal with them? (...) I'm not sure why the parent company has no relationship to the question, but I think we'd (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.people)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) But Lego Direct didn't leap onto LUGNET willy-nilly without first having reviewed the types of discussions that go on here. Anyone (and certainly an outreaching department of a multi-billion dollar company) could have predicted the way that (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup? —Ben Roller
|
| | | | (...) I don't know about that. After seeing Lego's lastest offering, it seems that the clone brands are where they're getting ideas now. Ha ha, only serious. Ben Roller P.S. Ok, I need some advice here. At this point I'm not intending to talk to TLC (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
