Subject:
|
Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 04:29:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2054 times
|
| |
|
|
I think it is precisly these types of posts that keep them away. Many people
post expecting answers *right now*, often on things they may not be able to
respond to. I think everyone needs to give them some breathing room. I also
think they should be able to respond to posts anywhere on Lugnet, at the very
least through two seperate accounts for official and unofficial posts.
Afterall, Lego's employees may be AFOLs, too, right? If you're afraid people
will take unofficial posts as official, have them use seperate signatures or
tags on their names that show up on the postings. If necessary, add a rule
about not harassing the Lego employees.
Jeff
In lugnet.lego.direct, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> Jake,
>
> I'd appreciate an answer.
>
> -Suz
>
> Suzanne Rich
> LUGNET Admin
> www.lugnet.com
>
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> > Jake,
> >
> > Why are you answering people's questions on FBTB, but not LUGNET?
> >
> > I ask because the lugnet.lego.direct group was created for open dialogue, yet
> > LD's posts are now rare and limited to marketing announcements.
> >
> > -Suz
> >
> > Suzanne Rich
> > LUGNET Admin
> > www.lugnet.com
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| (...) Very good points, Jeff. I wasn't going to hop in on this thread myself to be totally honest. It disturbs me in many ways. But at this point, I have something I really want to get out. The attitude posters and administrators on this site (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct) !!
| | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| (...) Current policy already allows this. Jake, for instance, is using his unofficial account right now. And conversations similar to the recent '20 Questions' have always been allowed on LUGNET. LEGO employees are welcome everywhere on LUGNET. The (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| (...) But Lego Direct didn't leap onto LUGNET willy-nilly without first having reviewed the types of discussions that go on here. Anyone (and certainly an outreaching department of a multi-billion dollar company) could have predicted the way that (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
134 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
