Subject:
|
Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:59:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2247 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Jeff Stembel writes:
> think they should be able to respond to posts anywhere on Lugnet, at the very
> least through two seperate accounts for official and unofficial posts.
> Afterall, Lego's employees may be AFOLs, too, right?
Current policy already allows this. Jake, for instance, is using his unofficial
account right now. And conversations similar to the recent '20 Questions' have
always been allowed on LUGNET.
LEGO employees are welcome everywhere on LUGNET. The only things kept inside
the .lego area are: official statements and lego.com e-mail addresses.
-Suz
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| Suz: Is their absence especially irritating because they have used references to Lugnet for certain marketing practices (like the Mania Magazine, I think it was), and that probably without permission? So they trade on the Lugnet name but don't (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| I think it is precisly these types of posts that keep them away. Many people post expecting answers *right now*, often on things they may not be able to respond to. I think everyone needs to give them some breathing room. I also think they should be (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
134 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
