Subject:
|
Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 20:39:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2096 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Dave Schuler writes:
> On the other hand, maybe Lego Direct is angry at the presence of MegaBloks
> supporters on LUGNET. Those dirty clone-fans--we should lynch 'em all!
I don't know about that. After seeing Lego's lastest offering, it seems
that the clone brands are where they're getting ideas now. Ha ha, only serious.
Ben Roller
P.S. Ok, I need some advice here. At this point I'm not intending to talk
to TLC or Lego Direct, but I don't know where to post or follow-up. It
seems that .lego.direct is getting an annoying amount of conversational
traffic these days, but it's not clear where stuff like this goes.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| (...) But Lego Direct didn't leap onto LUGNET willy-nilly without first having reviewed the types of discussions that go on here. Anyone (and certainly an outreaching department of a multi-billion dollar company) could have predicted the way that (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
134 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
