Subject:
|
Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 21:32:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2481 times
|
| |
|
|
Suz,
I'd appreciate an answer (too).
--Bill.
"richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> writes:
> Suz:
>
> Is their absence especially irritating because they have used references to
> Lugnet for certain marketing practices (like the Mania Magazine, I think it
> was), and that probably without permission? So they trade on the Lugnet name
> but don't actually participate -- is this part of your point?
>
> You have dropped hints at either being or having been a contracted designer
> for TLC in some way, is this the time for full disclosure? Perhaps I missed
> it elsewhere. Are you "inside" or are you "outside" at this point? How does
> your status inform your views about TLC's level of participation and the
> future of Lugnet in relation to TLC? Do you feel that Lugnet is being
> singled out for some kind of unfair treatment? Do you feel constrained in
> ways that others are not? Do you think TLC has different standards for
> nondisclosure (or do they merely enforce their rights unequally) on
> different individuals or organizations depending on whether they can get a
> positive marketing angle/spin out of it?
>
> What do you expect from TLC or Lego Direct and why do you expect it?
>
> I generally support your attitude here, I am just wondering if there are
> unknown justifications for your attitude that might help others understand
> what you are trying to accomplish. I know nothing and am assuming nothing
> about your possible answers to my questions. I just get the idea that your
> views are both more informed and complicated than the rest of us understand.
>
> -- Hop-Frog
--
William R Ward bill@wards.net http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AMAZING BUT TRUE: There is so much sand in northern Africa that if it were
spread out it would completely cover the Sahara Desert!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| Suz: Is their absence especially irritating because they have used references to Lugnet for certain marketing practices (like the Mania Magazine, I think it was), and that probably without permission? So they trade on the Lugnet name but don't (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
134 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
