 | | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
|
(...) Well being an ambassador I want to try and shed some light on this. First we do have to sign an NDA. This is understandable given the fact that LEGO doesn't want information being leaked before a product gets to market. With that said does the (...) (21 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
|
(...) This time around, are the ambassadors going to be given anything to communicate back to the communities they've been picked from? It seems that the first round were all immediately given NDAs to sign, preventing them from divulging any (...) (21 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.lego, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
|
(...) Fine, I've removed .nz from the crossposting. Tim (21 years ago, 5-Sep-05, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.jp, lugnet.loc.hk, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
|
(...) Although more people applying would be nice to see, the real requirement is better people applying. Cheers Richie Dulin (21 years ago, 5-Sep-05, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.nz, lugnet.loc.jp, lugnet.loc.hk, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
|
In lugnet.lego, Richie Dulin wrote: <snip> (...) Those two statements don't contradict one another, from what I see... It's like "We'll accept applications from all over the world!" If only Canadians send in applicaitons, then only Canadians will (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-05, to lugnet.lego) !
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
|
(...) From (URL) this post>: "...the first criteria before all others was to select the best group of candidates based on their applications. Now, if there was a 12 way tie, then perhaps location could help provide a tie-breaker" (emphasis mine) and (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-05, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
|
(...) I hope that some information I can add here might be helpful. I do have a handfull of contacts in Japan that I converse with regularly via e-mail. And even though I have done a larger number of trades - I can only speculate why they didn't (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
|
(...) How am I giving conflicting information? The only thing I can imagine *might* fall under that category is your question about geographic location being part of the selection process. Like I mentioned before, Ambassadors aren't chosen based on (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-05, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
|
(...) Dear Jake, I am not trying to attack a faceless monster here, I am responding to Lenny's claims that you guys were personally being in some way harrassed/ attacked/ asserted against in my original post. I believe that you love your job enough (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
|
(...) Well, I wasn’t upset because you said that, I was upset because the ambassadors didn’t do the same. (...) You certainly didn’t offend me by the statement. I thought it was great that applications spanned the globe. And disappointed that it (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
