 | | Re: Peeron inventories
|
|
(...) Is that 95% of the total? I must say, I'm entirely satisfied with the accuracy of the Peeron inventories, but then, I'm only referencing a very small selection. If your claim isn't about 95% of the total, could you clarify what your sample is? (...) (18 years ago, 8-Mar-07, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
|
(...) This is a pretty strong statement. Being someone who has submitted an inventory in the past, I'm curious to know exactly what is wrong with them. -Orion (18 years ago, 8-Mar-07, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Peeron inventories
|
|
I still have not heard from Dan, but I am finding that 95% of the inventories are incorrect. I would suggest not to go by the inventories on Peeron as I have now sent in 1000 emails with corrections and pictures and most are just sitting there not (...) (18 years ago, 7-Mar-07, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting technic piece, possible town use
|
|
(...) That's a ZNAP part. It is LEGO. (URL) (18 years ago, 28-Feb-07, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.inv, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Interesting technic piece, possible town use
|
|
While wandering around Bricklink, I found this auction. (URL) Does anyone recognize the curved part in the lower left of the 3rd photo down? I am not nearly up to speed on technic parts as I should be. The curve appears to be made around a 3 stud (...) (18 years ago, 28-Feb-07, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.inv, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory corrections
|
|
Hi John-- Tim is correct, this probably belongs in a different Lugnet group such as lugnet.db.inv or lugnet.inv. Personally, I guess I'd recommend lugnet.inv, since I believe "lugnet.db" was generally more intended for database discussions rather (...) (18 years ago, 12-Feb-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Updated my Photo-Inventory Page
|
|
There are now over 80 sets broken out by their full contents in an easy to view listing. (dialup warning, it's a big one) (URL) all the photos can be browsed in my Brickshelf folder here. (slightly more dialup friendly) (URL) note: Almost 25 (...) (18 years ago, 13-Nov-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | peeron inventories
|
|
I wrote awhile back complaining about the inventories at Peeron. I am happy to say that Clark has been taking my emails and correctingthe inventories and adding the pictures of sets and parts that I have been sending. I feel rather sorry for him as (...) (18 years ago, 6-Nov-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Extra parts no longer consistent?
|
|
(...) Probably bad to reply to myself, but I've had a change in thought on the last comment I made above. I'm now thinking the sensitivity/tolerence of the scales (and other counting devices/methods) has been increased. The change in thought came (...) (18 years ago, 17-Oct-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Extra parts no longer consistent?
|
|
Lately, I've been noticing that the extra parts included with sets is no longer consistent. The extra parts in the set I have can be a lot dfferent than those listed in the inventories at Peeron or BrickLink. (I've also noticed differences in what (...) (18 years ago, 17-Oct-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: part weight inventory
|
|
(...) That was my guess too, but yeah, no way to verify. Unless of course someone wants to take a high-precision scale to every Lego element out there and post the results. Or, if the Lego Company wants to tell us all what the weights are! (...) I (...) (18 years ago, 18-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: part weight inventory
|
|
(...) We assume, but cannot verify, that the weight submissions we get on BrickLink have actually been weighed on a scale. Some submitters add notes with their submissions such as "100 white bricks weighed on a +/- .01g scale" or something like (...) (18 years ago, 18-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: part weight inventory
|
|
(...) We discussed average piece weight in a recent thread: (URL) actually collected a lot of BrickLink's data in mid august. IIRC, I found in general that the BL weight was a little bit too heavy on average, when comparing to a few other sources of (...) (18 years ago, 17-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: part weight inventory
|
|
(...) Bricklink records the weight of many LEGO parts, however it's only approximate because two items of the same part can have different weights. ROSCO (18 years ago, 16-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | part weight inventory
|
|
Hi, Is there alreddy a list with the weight of each LEGO part? Could be interesting for some purpose. Ludo (18 years ago, 16-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventory mistakes
|
|
(...) Hi Eric, [LEGOSet 8757] (URL) There were three different versions of the string: 1) Green String with End Studs 41 studs in length (URL) 2) Black String with End Studs 41 studs in length (URL) 3) Green String without studs + 2x part #3134 (2 (...) (18 years ago, 13-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv, lugnet.technic.bionicle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventory mistakes
|
|
(...) Rene- Very interesting! What was the set and parts in question? I'm just curious... Thanks, Eric (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventory mistakes
|
|
In article <6f6f2b5c0609111337j...gmail.com> , Dan Boger <dan@peeron.com> writes (...) I think people know that there are humans in there somewhere. :-) I start worry if do not receive a reply or acknowledgement within a week. Maybe if the email is (...) (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventory mistakes
|
|
(...) Please do send any corrections for mistakes you find! Send updates to inv at peeron dot com - that address goes to everyone who has access to update the inventories. Thanks! Dan (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventory mistakes
|
|
Dan, thanks for the response. Do you want me to forward what I find to you? I just finshed 349 and there are a lot of mistakes in the inventory. If you do not want me to forward this stuff to you, please just let me know. John P (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
