 | | Re: part weight inventory
|
|
(...) That was my guess too, but yeah, no way to verify. Unless of course someone wants to take a high-precision scale to every Lego element out there and post the results. Or, if the Lego Company wants to tell us all what the weights are! (...) I (...) (18 years ago, 18-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: part weight inventory
|
|
(...) We assume, but cannot verify, that the weight submissions we get on BrickLink have actually been weighed on a scale. Some submitters add notes with their submissions such as "100 white bricks weighed on a +/- .01g scale" or something like (...) (18 years ago, 18-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: part weight inventory
|
|
(...) We discussed average piece weight in a recent thread: (URL) actually collected a lot of BrickLink's data in mid august. IIRC, I found in general that the BL weight was a little bit too heavy on average, when comparing to a few other sources of (...) (18 years ago, 17-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: part weight inventory
|
|
(...) Bricklink records the weight of many LEGO parts, however it's only approximate because two items of the same part can have different weights. ROSCO (18 years ago, 16-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | part weight inventory
|
|
Hi, Is there alreddy a list with the weight of each LEGO part? Could be interesting for some purpose. Ludo (18 years ago, 16-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventory mistakes
|
|
(...) Hi Eric, [LEGOSet 8757] (URL) There were three different versions of the string: 1) Green String with End Studs 41 studs in length (URL) 2) Black String with End Studs 41 studs in length (URL) 3) Green String without studs + 2x part #3134 (2 (...) (18 years ago, 13-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv, lugnet.technic.bionicle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventory mistakes
|
|
(...) Rene- Very interesting! What was the set and parts in question? I'm just curious... Thanks, Eric (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventory mistakes
|
|
In article <6f6f2b5c0609111337j...gmail.com> , Dan Boger <dan@peeron.com> writes (...) I think people know that there are humans in there somewhere. :-) I start worry if do not receive a reply or acknowledgement within a week. Maybe if the email is (...) (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventory mistakes
|
|
(...) Please do send any corrections for mistakes you find! Send updates to inv at peeron dot com - that address goes to everyone who has access to update the inventories. Thanks! Dan (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventory mistakes
|
|
Dan, thanks for the response. Do you want me to forward what I find to you? I just finshed 349 and there are a lot of mistakes in the inventory. If you do not want me to forward this stuff to you, please just let me know. John P (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventory mistakes
|
|
(...) John - from what I can tell, you sent us an email on 9/4? Sorry it's taking a while to get back to you, but our hard working admins can't work on the site full time. Sometimes it might take a while to respond to every email we get, but we do (...) (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventory mistakes
|
|
(...) On this year's 1000steine-Land event we held a competition with 20 identical sets, all bought at the same time at the same place. At least in one step the sets came in three different versions with slightly different pieces. It's also known (...) (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventory mistakes
|
|
Thanks for the suggestions and insight. I am not too techincal and really the only way I have time to update is to send it by email. I am not talking about a lot, but one or two at the most a day. I have 7300 sets and am now building all the ones (...) (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventory mistakes
|
|
(...) Peeron admins sometimes take a little time before responding and fixing an inventory-- but in my experience they have fixed every error I have sent them. And just in case, be sure to send corrections through the web interface (the link that (...) (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventory mistakes
|
|
(...) Sounds like you are exactly the kind of person Peeron needs. Peeeeeron... Hello? Peeron? I think you got a QC man right here. Mark (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: EXO-FORCE - #7712 New Canopy?
|
|
(...) Eh, honestly, I can't think of a good use for it. Its the wrong shape. If it was longer, then it'd make a good aircraft streamlined canopy.... if it didn't bubble out like it does, then it'd be great for more bulky craft and robots and (...) (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Peeron inventory mistakes
|
|
I have been finding many many errors on the Peeron inventory lists. I have contacted them and they do not respond. To keep things correct I will be noting on the Lugnet set guide when an inventory is wrong. I have found so many mistakes in their (...) (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: EXO-FORCE - #7712 New Canopy?
|
|
(...) Actually, that canopy made its debut in 2002 in a few SW sets: (URL) think the set you linked is available at TRU. -Rob www.brickmodder.net www.lifelites.com (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: EXO-FORCE - #7712 New Canopy?
|
|
(...) Ahh I see it in this picture now: (URL) haha kinda looks like my (URL) Wrecker>. e (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: EXO-FORCE - #7712 New Canopy?
|
|
Ahh I see now. Sure looks nice in the catalog. drool drool (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
