 | | Re: new set connectability?
|
|
(...) Some sets that's true (most of 4730), others its not. For example, if you take off the green roof bits of 4735 slytherin, it's not nearly as tall as the module needs to be to work with the other modules, which are all thirteen bricks tall (...) (22 years ago, 28-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: new set connectability?
|
|
(...) Not if it was situated in a part of the castle that is only two floors high. I think expecting total realism from a LEGO(R) toy building set is not realistic. Build your own Hogwarts(R) castle, with your own Harry Potter(R) and Hermione (...) (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | mistake in my 4733 "Dueling Club"
|
|
Stopped at the LEGO Imagination Center at the Mall of America today, and picked up a couple of the new Harry Potter sets. Much to my surprise, the first one I opened had a mistake in it! My Harry minifig has the wrong torso -- he doesn't have his (...) (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: new set connectability?
|
|
I think you are supposed to take the sand green roof pieces off, and then you find that they stack nicely. Of course, i don't own any of them, but I can see it in the pictures rather clearly. -Alfred (...) (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: new set connectability?
|
|
"William R Ward" <bill@wards.net> wrote in message news:m2elbfdvkf.fsf@...rds.net... (...) Even so, Hogwarts castle has many more than just one floor above the ground floor. A first floor bathroom would logically still have other rooms above it. (...) (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: new set connectability?
|
|
(...) In England, and in fact most places outside the USA, "first floor" is not the ground floor, but the one above. Could this explain the problem? --Bill (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter (CofS) and monster sets good for new elements
|
|
(...) The shield itself is black. (the set also comes with a light gray sword.) John (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: new set connectability?
|
|
I disagree with Kecia. I have the new sets, and while they may seem like they are part of the modular design, there are many "topper" modules. Most aren't able to have other sets stacked ot top of them, only able to "sit" on other modules. ie:what (...) (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter (CofS) and monster sets good for new elements
|
|
(...) What is not apparent on the pictures is dark grey dragon wings (looks great on a black dragon) and a dark grey scorpion. 4 cylinder pieces are plain grey, 4 are grey with stone pattern print. Arne, Copenhagen (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | thanks for the quick reply, this new stuff looks great...
|
|
When I look at the picture though, I am seeing a few of the first generation sets have been removed from the overall model. (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: new set connectability?
|
|
(...) Hi Adam. Yes, the new Harry Potter (castle) sets are made to the modular design, just like the old ones. So you can build them together, just as you like. I scanned the danish catalog a while ago. This show a picture, of how Lego connects all (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | new set connectability?
|
|
The new Harry Potter sets are not yet available in my area, but I like the look of what I've seen so far from the few pictures that have been made available. My question is this: I thought I saw on one of the advertisements the statement, Return to (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter Phoenix Deely [Now contains GOF spoilers]
|
|
(...) ... (...) Er, no, *my* fault. In my jumbled mess of a memory, I thought that was revealed in the 2nd book, sorry. I should've realized that I might remember bits from the 3rd and 4th books and not remember the exact sequence of revelations. (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter Phoenix Deely [Now contains GOF spoilers]
|
|
(...) Ah that's no biggie, like stated earlier, it really doesn't reveal much about the story. I knew it was a spoiler but I'm a sucker for that stuff. I'm at the point in the story where he is starting the second task/challenge. I'll probably be (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter Phoenix Deely [Now contains GOF spoilers]
|
|
(...) You're right...my fault. But by the time I had realized that portions could be read in the web interface preview and that I forgot the spoiler space, I had posted. I usually strictly adhere to spoiler space in alt.fan.harry-potter...I even (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter Phoenix Deely [Now contains GOF spoilers]
|
|
(...) That text is from the Goblet of Fire; hence the "four years ago" part of it... They don't mention it in the first movie, either. In fact, I don't even think we see Fawkes in the first movie (or book). James (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter Phoenix Deely [Now contains GOF spoilers]
|
|
(...) No, not entirely. Matt *did* warn of a spoiler in the subject header, but if you glance at the post on the web interface, it's hard to avoid reading it. The customary thing to do is to place the spoiler well into the post so you have fair (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter Phoenix Deely [Now contains GOF spoilers]
|
|
Not to be a wise-behind, but the text comes from the first book. It is also in the first movie. So if you hadn't read the first book or seen the first movie then it would have mattered about this info. There was nothing new revealed information (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter Phoenix Deely [Now contains GOF spoilers]
|
|
Crap, wish I hadn't read that. Ah well it doesn't reveal that much about the story. Oh well, my bad, ha ha. (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter Phoenix Deely [Now contains GOF spoilers]
|
|
(...) 'Tis true: "Exactly," said Dumbledore. "Harry's wand and Voldemorts wand share cores. Each of them contains a feather from the tail of the same phoenix. This phoenix, in fact," he added, and he pointed at the scarlet-and-gold bird, perching (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
