Subject:
|
Re: new set connectability?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.harrypotter
|
Date:
|
Fri, 27 Sep 2002 20:30:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2748 times
|
| |
|
|
"DrewBear" <DrewBear@ATT.Net> writes:
> I disagree with Kecia. I have the new sets, and while they may seem like
> they are part of the modular design, there are many "topper" modules. Most
> aren't able to have other sets stacked ot top of them, only able to "sit" on
> other modules. ie:what was supposed to be a first floor bathroom in set
> 4730 can only sit on top of other sets, ¡duh! not very first floor.
In England, and in fact most places outside the USA, "first floor" is
not the ground floor, but the one above. Could this explain the problem?
--Bill
--
William R Ward bill@wards.net http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistency is not really a human trait.
--Maude (from the film "Harold & Maude")
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: new set connectability?
|
| "William R Ward" <bill@wards.net> wrote in message news:m2elbfdvkf.fsf@...rds.net... (...) Even so, Hogwarts castle has many more than just one floor above the ground floor. A first floor bathroom would logically still have other rooms above it. (...) (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: new set connectability?
|
| I disagree with Kecia. I have the new sets, and while they may seem like they are part of the modular design, there are many "topper" modules. Most aren't able to have other sets stacked ot top of them, only able to "sit" on other modules. ie:what (...) (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
