Subject:
|
Re: Here's a question...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Dec 2007 03:53:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3628 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, David Eaton wrote:
>
> It doesn't follow a bell curve, it's more like:
>
> I | . . . .xxxx. . .
> n | . . . x xxx . .
> t | . . . x. . x . .
> e |x. . . x . . x. .
> r | xx . . x . . x .
> e | . xxx. xx . . .x x.
> s | . xxxxx. . . . xx .
> t | . . . . . . .
> +-+----+----+----+----+----+----+-
> 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
> Year
Dave, you are one of the geekiest people I "know", and I mean that in the most
flattering way!
[JOHN]
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Here's a question...
|
| (...) That graph is pretty close for me as well... I've spent the last few nights (amongst doing other things) putting together the space sets from my youth--last night I started in on the 'Space Police 1' sets--this after I put together the (...) (17 years ago, 7-Dec-07, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Here's a question...
|
| (...) I'm somewhere between these two, I guess (not that this ever seems to happen to me). I look to see what's in there first before getting excited. Used lego from 2002 (say) doesn't really excite me that much. Considering that most people's (...) (17 years ago, 6-Dec-07, to lugnet.general)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
