General Discussion : 44780


General / 44780	44779 \| 44781

Subject:	Re: MHoF : Harry Cane might be disqualified
Newsgroups:	lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general
Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:29:37 GMT
Viewed:	74 times

In lugnet.adventurers, Terry Prosper wrote:

In lugnet.adventurers, James Wilson wrote:

Hey, nothing wrong with a little lobbying, is there?

There is, mind you, something wrong about electioneering.

Then there is certainly a problem. I have often seen posts in specific forums urging people to vote for a fig in their particular theme. You almost encourage that yourself by posting to the different Lunet newsgroups saying “these figs from your theme of choice are up for election”.

Bruce

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: MHoF : Harry Cane might be disqualified
(...) As I already said, maybe I don't correctly understand the work electionneering, but what I meant was that I don't want people linking to my site with the express message to "vote for Mr. X". Of course, here on Lugnet as on other websites, I (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jan-04, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: MHoF : Harry Cane might be disqualified
(...) The "american-way" isn't MY way, as I'm neither American nor American-wannabe. There is, mind you, something wrong about electioneering. The MHoF voting process should be a choice based on more than a "I-Like-This-Theme" factor. Systematically (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jan-04, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general, FTX)

16 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search