To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 43051
43050  |  43052
Subject: 
New Star Wars (from FBTB)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general
Followup-To: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Fri, 12 Sep 2003 02:24:15 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
95 times
  
Quoted from front page of http://www,fbtb.net

First up we have a new UCS Snowspeeder - due in November from LEGO Direct. I’m working on gathering final details, so stay tuned on that one. Also, for those of you who are getting your Cloud City sets (and Marty sends word they are shipping in Australia) you’ll find a surprise on the back - an image of another redesigned set for January of 2004 . . .

A new Millennium Falcon.

I brought this here to discuss. While I am schyed for the UCS Snowspeeder, I do have my opinions on the Millenium Falcon.

What is LEGO doing here? Okay, they have a license that is worth a lot and they need to capitalize on this. OK. There are lots of possibilities around for many new sets (Jawa Sandcrawler, Hoth Playsets, Death Star Playsets, Sail Barge, the list goes on...) but instead, (at least for 2004) LEGO is loading the line with redesigned reissues. (X-Wing and now Millinuim Falcon) While I love the design of the new X-Wing, why couldn’t they do it right once and leave it be?

The 7190 Millienium Falcon is a bad set, I agree. However, for those that spent upwards of $300, it sure is unfair that we now have 2 versions floating around, and in order to stay complete in your collection or keep up to date with your minifig sets, you will have to fork out another $100 to buy Millenium Falcon #2.

I have very mixed emotions on this, what do others think?

Jeremy Scott



Message has 6 Replies:
  Re: New Star Wars (from FBTB)
 
(...) Oops, I just posted simultaneously with the same news from FBTB. Oh well, sorry for the redundancy... Anyway, Jeremy, since you asked, I respectfully disagree with your thoughts on the new Millennium Falcon. To sum it all up, I understand your (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
  Re: New Star Wars (from FBTB)
 
I posted this in the other thread on this as well, but DoubleT, a poster on the FBTB forums, has pictures of the upcoming MF on his site: (URL) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
  Re: New Star Wars (from FBTB)
 
(...) I think they're trying to keep the signature ships available. Future Star Wars LEGO fan growth is limited if you can't get certain sets. As to why a redesign instead of a re-release? Well, TLC isn't out to make collectors happy (and note there (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.starwars)
  Re: New Star Wars (from FBTB)
 
(...) I LOVE the new Falcon. it appears to be less randomly colored (more grays instead of blue & red) I like the cockpit which can apparently fit 2 figs side-by-side, & i love the cockpit access tube, which appears to be able to allow figs to 'walk (...) (21 years ago, 13-Sep-03, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
  Re: New Star Wars (from FBTB)
 
(...) spent (...) around, (...) your (...) Falcon #2. (...) If you're just into this hobby to have one of everything, you're into it for the wrong reason. A guy I used to know went crazy when all the new Star Wars toys and action figures came out. (...) (21 years ago, 14-Sep-03, to lugnet.starwars)
  Re: New Star Wars (from FBTB)
 
(...) I buy LEGO to play and have fun. This is what the core of the LEGO hobby is all about: a great toy to that inspries the creativity in all of us. Nothing make me happier than when someone says "I don't like the look of that set but look at all (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-03, to lugnet.starwars, FTX) ! 

10 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR