Subject:
|
Re: Which weighs more?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:57:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
892 times
|
| |
|
|
I would bet that this decrease in mass/stud as the brick lengthens has
to do with the fact that for the smaller bricks the end 'walls' account
for more volume on a percentage basis.
eric
Christopher Tracey wrote:
> David Simmons wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > In my latest project (making a Gunstar) I'm using a lot of 1x16 Technic
> > beams, however there are two where I'm using none of the friction peg
> > holes
> > for anything. Would a regular 1x16 beam weigh less or more? I'm
> > trying to
> > reduce weight wherever possible due to the design of the ship.
>
>
> from a thread about two years ago- of course this is half the length you
> need.
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/market/shipping/?n=362
>
> 1x8 brick = 3.06061 g
> 1x8 technic brk = 2.89084 g
>
> It's interesting to note the relative mass per stud appears to decrease
> as the length of the brick increases. I wonder if there is a
> compensation point.
>
> -chris
>
>
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Which weighs more?
|
| (...) from a thread about two years ago- of course this is half the length you need. (URL) brick = 3.06061 g 1x8 technic brk = 2.89084 g It's interesting to note the relative mass per stud appears to decrease as the length of the brick increases. I (...) (22 years ago, 6-Mar-03, to lugnet.general)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
