Subject:
|
Re: Which weighs more?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 02:02:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
463 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <HB5vt2.3uw@lugnet.com>,
David Simmons <xenobuzz@earthlink.net> wrote:
> In my latest project (making a Gunstar) I'm using a lot of 1x16 Technic
> beams, however there are two where I'm using none of the friction peg holes
> for anything. Would a regular 1x16 beam weigh less or more?
I've never seen a non-Technic 1x16 beam.
--
DON'T PAY MORE FOR WEB HOSTING THAN WHAT YOU WANT TO PAY
At Full System, Inc. you invent the package *and* the price!
Point your browser to http://custom.fullsystem.com/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Which weighs more?
|
| (...) I had never seen one until two tan ones showed up in Yoda. However, I just call them 1 x 16 'bricks'. I only think of 'beam' when referring to the Technic versions. I'm not sure how much it matters... they're both LEGO pieces. :) Here's a list (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Which weighs more?
|
| Hey all, In my latest project (making a Gunstar) I'm using a lot of 1x16 Technic beams, however there are two where I'm using none of the friction peg holes for anything. Would a regular 1x16 beam weigh less or more? I'm trying to reduce weight (...) (22 years ago, 3-Mar-03, to lugnet.general)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
